Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24757518›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in vaccines2013

Novel HIV vaccine strategies: overview and perspective.

Yehuda Z Cohen, Raphael Dolin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in vaccines, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Synthetic biology approach for the development of conditionally replicating HIV-1 vaccine.Journal of chemical technology and biotechnology (Oxford, Oxfordshire : 1986) · 2017
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Future Challenges for Vaccinologists.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2016
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Human immunodeficiency virus vaccines.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2014
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Fcgbp - A Potential Viral Trap in RV144.The open AIDS journal · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yehuda Z CohenCenter for Virus and Vaccine Research, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, E/CLS-1003, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, 02215, USA.
Raphael DolinBeth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Multidisciplinary HIV Training ProgramT32AI007387 · NIAID · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Daniel R. Kuritzkes · 1990 to 2026
$8.8M
NIAID NIH HHS T32 AI007387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) vaccine remains a central component in the quest to control the worldwide epidemic. To examine the status of the development of HIV vaccines, we review the results of the efficacy trials carried out to date and the immunologic principles that guided them. Four vaccine concepts have been evaluated in HIV-1 vaccine efficacy trials, and the results of these trials have provided significant information for future vaccine development. While one of these trials demonstrated that a safe and effective HIV vaccine is possible, many questions remain regarding the basis for the observed protection and the most efficient way to stimulate it. Novel HIV vaccine strategies including induction of highly potent broadly neutralizing antibodies, use of novel homologous and heterologous vector systems, and vectored immunoprophylaxis seek to expand and build upon the knowledge gained from these trials.

Indexed as

AIDSVAXHIV vaccineHIV vaccine clinical trialsHIV vaccine reviewHVTN 505RV144Step

Identifiers

PMID24757518
PMCPMC3967667

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.