Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24757226›Full record

ArticleDiabetes care2014

Closed-loop artificial pancreas systems: engineering the algorithms.

Francis J Doyle, Lauren M Huyett, Joon Bok Lee, Howard C Zisser, Eyal Dassau

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Diabetes care, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 119 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
119citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

119 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review

59 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Francis J DoyleCorresponding author: Francis J. Doyle III, doyle@engineering.ucsb.edu.
Lauren M Huyett
Joon Bok Lee
Howard C Zisser
Eyal Dassau

Funding

Ambulatory Artificial Pancreas: merging physiology, behavior, and control designDP3DK094331 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI BASU, ANANDA, DOYLE, FRANCIS J · 2011 to 2014
$4.6M
Closed-loop Artificial Pancreas: Algorithm Engineering and Clinical EvaluationR01DK085628 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARBARA · PI DOYLE, FRANCIS J, JOVANOVIC, LOIS · 2009 to 2013
$3.4M
NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK094331NIDDK NIH HHS DP3-DK-094331NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK085628NIDDK NIH HHS R01-DK-085628
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this two-part Bench to Clinic narrative, recent advances in both the preclinical and clinical aspects of artificial pancreas (AP) development are described. In the preceding Bench narrative, Kudva and colleagues provide an in-depth understanding of the modified glucoregulatory physiology of type 1 diabetes that will help refine future AP algorithms. In the Clinic narrative presented here, we compare and evaluate AP technology to gain further momentum toward outpatient trials and eventual approval for widespread use. We enumerate the design objectives, variables, and challenges involved in AP development, concluding with a discussion of recent clinical advancements. Thanks to the effective integration of engineering and medicine, the dream of automated glucose regulation is nearing reality. Consistent and methodical presentation of results will accelerate this success, allowing head-to-head comparisons that will facilitate adoption of the AP as a standard therapy for type 1 diabetes.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAdolescentAdultBiomedical EngineeringBlood GlucoseChildChild, PreschoolDiabetes Mellitus, Type 1HumansInsulinInsulin Infusion SystemsMiddle AgedOutpatientsPancreas, ArtificialYoung AdultBlood GlucoseInsulin

Identifiers

PMID24757226
PMCPMC3994938

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.