Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24757054›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies.

Greger Larson, Dolores R Piperno, Robin G Allaby, Michael D Purugganan, Leif Andersson, Manuel Arroyo-Kalin, Loukas Barton, Cynthia Climer Vigueira, Tim Denham, Keith Dobney and 14 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 240 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
240citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

240 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. CCT domain-containing genes in cereal crops: flowering time and beyond.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. The historical domestication of aProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Overview of Plant Genetic Resources Conservation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Long-term synchronous changes in body size among domesticated and wild species.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  20. Review

180 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors.

Greger LarsonDurham Evolution and Ancient DNA, Department of Archaeology, Durham University, Durham DH1 3LE, United Kingdom.
Dolores R Piperno
Robin G Allaby
Michael D Purugganan
Leif Andersson
Manuel Arroyo-Kalin
Loukas Barton
Cynthia Climer Vigueira
Tim Denham
Keith Dobney
Andrew N Doust
Paul Gepts
M Thomas P Gilbert
Kristen J Gremillion
Leilani Lucas
Lewis Lukens
Fiona B Marshall
Kenneth M Olsen
J Chris Pires
Peter J Richerson
Rafael Rubio de Casas
Oris I Sanjur
Mark G Thomas
Dorian Q Fuller

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is difficult to overstate the cultural and biological impacts that the domestication of plants and animals has had on our species. Fundamental questions regarding where, when, and how many times domestication took place have been of primary interest within a wide range of academic disciplines. Within the last two decades, the advent of new archaeological and genetic techniques has revolutionized our understanding of the pattern and process of domestication and agricultural origins that led to our modern way of life. In the spring of 2011, 25 scholars with a central interest in domestication representing the fields of genetics, archaeobotany, zooarchaeology, geoarchaeology, and archaeology met at the National Evolutionary Synthesis Center to discuss recent domestication research progress and identify challenges for the future. In this introduction to the resulting Special Feature, we present the state of the art in the field by discussing what is known about the spatial and temporal patterns of domestication, and controversies surrounding the speed, intentionality, and evolutionary aspects of the domestication process. We then highlight three key challenges for future research. We conclude by arguing that although recent progress has been impressive, the next decade will yield even more substantial insights not only into how domestication took place, but also when and where it did, and where and why it did not.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, DomesticBiological EvolutionCrops, AgriculturalEnvironmentGeographySpatio-Temporal Analysisagricultureevolutionhuman ecologyhuman historyselection

Identifiers

PMID24757054
PMCPMC4035915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.