Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24756577›Full record

ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2015

Expanding endoscopic interventions for pancreatic pseudocyst and walled-off necrosis.

Shuntaro Mukai, Takao Itoi, Atsushi Sofuni, Fumihide Itokawa, Toshio Kurihara, Takayoshi Tsuchiya, Kentaro Ishii, Shujiro Tsuji, Nobuhito Ikeuchi, Reina Tanaka and 5 more

Abstract readEvaluation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Endoscopic treatment of multilocular walled-off pancreatic necrosis with the multiple transluminal gateway technique.Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2017
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Shuntaro MukaiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Tokyo Medical University, 6-7-1 Nishishinjuku, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 160-0023, Japan, maezora1031@yahoo.co.jp.
Takao Itoi
Atsushi Sofuni
Fumihide Itokawa
Toshio Kurihara
Takayoshi Tsuchiya
Kentaro Ishii
Shujiro Tsuji
Nobuhito Ikeuchi
Reina Tanaka
Junko Umeda
Ryosuke Tonozuka
Mitsuyoshi Honjo
Takuji Gotoda
Fuminori Moriyasu
Tokyo Medical University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRecently, several endoscopists have described the usefulness of the endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)-guided, single transluminal gateway technique (SGT) using transmural placement of single or multiple plastic stents or metal stents for a pancreatic pseudocyst (PC) and walled-off necrosis (WON). Moreover, the uses of the multiple transluminal gateway technique (MTGT) and single transluminal gateway transcystic multiple drainages (SGTMD) for complicated pancreatic walled-off necrosis have recently been reported. The aim of this study is to evaluate retrospectively the feasibility and efficacy of endotherapy for the treatment of complicated PC and WON cases.

methodsEighty-nine patients with a PC (n = 14) and WON (n = 75) were treated under EUS guidance.

resultsIn a total of 89 cases using SGT in combination with MTGT or SGTMD, the present study showed a technical success rate of 100 %, a final clinical success rate of 97.8 %, an adverse event during procedure rate of 0 %, an early adverse event rate of 12.4 %, and a mortality rate of 2.2 %.

conclusionsEven complicated WON cases can be treated using combination endotherapies, although a surgical approach as well as a percutaneous approach should be considered in the cases refractory to endoscopic therapies.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overChildDrainageEndosonographyFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNecrosisPancreasPancreatic PseudocystPancreatitis, Acute Necrotizing

Identifiers

PMID24756577
OpenAlexW2032357482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.