ArticleCurrent treatment options in neurology2014
Selection of antiepileptic drugs in older people.
Article in Current treatment options in neurology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- STOPP/START version 3: clinical pharmacists are raising concerns.European geriatric medicine · 2024Article
- Perceived quality of life (QOLIE-31-P), depression (NDDI-E), anxiety (GAD-7), and insomnia in patients with epilepsy attended at a refractory epilepsy unit in real-life clinical practice.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2022Observational
- The New Antiepileptic Drugs: Their Neuropharmacology and Clinical Indications.Neurologia medico-chirurgica · 2016Review
- The relationship between epilepsy and sexual dysfunction: a review of the literature.SpringerPlus · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
opinion statementElderly people are one of the fastest-growing populations in the United States, and the incidence of epilepsy in older people is much higher than in other population subgroups. This age group is the most vulnerable because of the increased incidence of multiple medical comorbidities, including stroke. The diagnosis of epilepsy is extremely challenging and often delayed in this age group because of an atypical presentation. Seizures are manifest through extremely vague complaints, such as episodes of altered mental status or memory lapses. Once the diagnosis is established by careful history taking and diagnostic testing, anticonvulsants are the mainstay of treatment. The choice of anticonvulsants in elderly patients requires careful evaluation of medical comorbidities, which vary on an individual basis. This subgroup also is more susceptible to adverse effects because of the physiologic changes in the body due to older age, which affect the pharmacokinetics of most anticonvulsants. The ideal drug in this age group should have linear pharmacokinetics, fewer adverse effects, minimal or no drug-drug interactions, no enzyme induction/inhibition, a long half-life, and minimal protein binding, and should be cost-effective. As such, there is no ideal drug for this patient population, although both older- and newer-generation anticonvulsants are used for long-term treatment. Most newer anticonvulsants have the advantage of a favorable pharmacokinetic profile, minimal or no drug-drug interactions, and fewer adverse events, as well as being well tolerated. The older anticonvulsants still are widely used, because the newer anticonvulsants are much more expensive.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.