Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24756366›Full record

SynthesisAdvances in therapy2014

Perioperative landiolol administration reduces atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Atsuhiro Sakamoto, Toshimitsu Hamasaki, Masafumi Kitakaze

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-Analysis
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Advances in therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Beta-Blocker Landiolol Hydrochloride in Preventing Atrial Fibrillation Following Cardiothoracic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Annals of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery : official journal of the Association of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeons of Asia · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Acute rate control in atrial fibrillation: an urgent need for the clinician.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Landiolol for managing atrial fibrillation in post-cardiac surgery.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  16. Landiolol: pharmacology and its use for rate control in atrial fibrillation in an emergency setting.European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology · 2018
    Article
  17. The Real Role of β-Blockers in Daily Cardiovascular Therapy.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2017
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Atsuhiro SakamotoDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Nippon Medical School, Tokyo, 113-8603, Japan, no1-saka@nms.ac.jp.
Toshimitsu Hamasaki
Masafumi Kitakaze
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPNippon Medical School · JPOsaka University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is one of the most common complications after cardiac surgery. Patients who develop POAF have a prolonged stay in the intensive care unit and hospital and an increased risk of postoperative stroke. Many guidelines for the management of cardiac surgery patients, therefore, recommend perioperative administration of beta-blockers to prevent and treat POAF. Landiolol is an ultra-short acting beta-blocker, and some randomized controlled trials of landiolol administration for the prevention of POAF have been conducted in Japan. This meta-analysis evaluated the effectiveness of landiolol administration for the prevention of POAF after cardiac surgery.

methodsThe Medline/PubMed and BioMed Central databases were searched for randomized controlled trials comparing cardiac surgery patients who received perioperative landiolol with a control group (saline administration, no drug administration, or other treatment). Two independent reviewers selected the studies for inclusion. Data regarding POAF and safety outcomes were extracted. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the Mantel-Haenszel method (fixed effects model).

resultsSix trials with a total of 560 patients were included in the meta-analysis. Landiolol administration significantly reduced the incidence of POAF after cardiac surgery (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.17-0.40). The effectiveness of landiolol administration was similar in three groups: all patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.43), patients who underwent CABG compared with a control group who received saline or nothing (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.17-0.45), and all patients who underwent cardiac surgery compared with a control group who received saline or nothing (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.42). Only two adverse events associated with landiolol administration were observed (2/302, 0.7%): hypotension in one patient and asthma in one patient.

conclusionLandiolol administration reduces the incidence of POAF after cardiac surgery and is well tolerated.

Indexed as

Atrial FibrillationAdrenergic beta-AntagonistsCardiac Surgical ProceduresHumansIncidenceJapanMorpholinesPostoperative ComplicationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicTreatment OutcomeUreaAdrenergic beta-AntagonistslandiololMorpholinesUrea

Identifiers

PMID24756366
PMCPMC4003343
OpenAlexW2008104544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.