Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24755864›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Advanced beamformers for cochlear implant users: acute measurement of speech perception in challenging listening conditions.

Andreas Buechner, Karl-Heinz Dyballa, Phillipp Hehrmann, Stefan Fredelake, Thomas Lenarz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03361527 (Evaluation of a Binaural Beamformer), which is not on this map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03361527 completednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of a Binaural Beamformer (StereoZoom) in a Virtual Acoustic Environment and in Real Life

TypeobservationalSponsorAdvanced Bionics AGRan2015 to 2016Enrolled4ConditionsSensory Hearing LossArmsbinaural beamformer
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Speech Understanding in Complex Listening Environments by Listeners Fit With Cochlear Implants.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2017
    Review
  17. Benefit of the UltraZoom beamforming technology in noise in cochlear implant users.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2017
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andreas BuechnerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence hearing4all, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Karl-Heinz DyballaDepartment of Otolaryngology, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
Phillipp HehrmannAdvanced Bionics GmbH, European Research Center, Hannover, Germany.
Stefan FredelakeAdvanced Bionics GmbH, European Research Center, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas LenarzDepartment of Otolaryngology, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany; Cluster of Excellence hearing4all, Medical University Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
ABX-CRO Advanced Pharmaceutical Services (Germany) · DEMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEHearing4all · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo investigate the performance of monaural and binaural beamforming technology with an additional noise reduction algorithm, in cochlear implant recipients.

methodThis experimental study was conducted as a single subject repeated measures design within a large German cochlear implant centre. Twelve experienced users of an Advanced Bionics HiRes90K or CII implant with a Harmony speech processor were enrolled. The cochlear implant processor of each subject was connected to one of two bilaterally placed state-of-the-art hearing aids (Phonak Ambra) providing three alternative directional processing options: an omnidirectional setting, an adaptive monaural beamformer, and a binaural beamformer. A further noise reduction algorithm (ClearVoice) was applied to the signal on the cochlear implant processor itself. The speech signal was presented from 0° and speech shaped noise presented from loudspeakers placed at ±70°, ±135° and 180°. The Oldenburg sentence test was used to determine the signal-to-noise ratio at which subjects scored 50% correct.

resultsBoth the adaptive and binaural beamformer were significantly better than the omnidirectional condition (5.3 dB±1.2 dB and 7.1 dB±1.6 dB (p<0.001) respectively). The best score was achieved with the binaural beamformer in combination with the ClearVoice noise reduction algorithm, with a significant improvement in SRT of 7.9 dB±2.4 dB (p<0.001) over the omnidirectional alone condition.

conclusionsThe study showed that the binaural beamformer implemented in the Phonak Ambra hearing aid could be used in conjunction with a Harmony speech processor to produce substantial average improvements in SRT of 7.1 dB. The monaural, adaptive beamformer provided an averaged SRT improvement of 5.3 dB.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantsSpeech PerceptionAdultAgedAnalysis of VarianceAuditory ThresholdEnvironmentHumansMiddle AgedSignal-To-Noise Ratio

Identifiers

PMID24755864
PMCPMC3995709
OpenAlexW2024299012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.