ArticleCancer biology & therapy2014
Evaluating new therapies in gastrointestinal stromal tumor using in vivo molecular optical imaging.
Article in Cancer biology & therapy, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Tumor-targetingHeliyon · 2018Article
- A plant alkaloid, veratridine, potentiates cancer chemosensitivity by UBXN2A-dependent inhibition of an oncoprotein, mortalin-2.Oncotarget · 2015Article
- Image-Guided Tumor Resection.Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors in the US. The majority (~85%) of GISTs possess gain-of-function mutations in KIT or PDGFRA, causing constitutive activation of the kinase receptor. GIST management has been transformed by the identification of tumor driver mutations leading to unprecedented disease control of advanced GIST with the introduction of imatinib mesylate (IM). Despite IM's efficacy, most patients experience primary and/or secondary resistance within 2 y of treatment. Additional therapies and methods to optimize screening of novel approaches in preclinical studies are warranted. Clinically, treatment efficacy is typically assessed using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) guidelines or Choi criteria. Both require a period of time on therapy before changes indicative of response can be observed. In addition, neither informs directly about cell death. We evaluated the use of molecular imaging technology in an animal model using near-infrared (NIR) imaging probes together with three-dimensional fluorescence molecular tomography (FMT) for assessing therapeutic response and ultimately optimizing our understanding of the biologic effects of these agents. We determined the potential of NIR probes (PSVue(TM) 794 and cell-penetrating KcapQ647) for detecting distinct markers of apoptosis and compare this to tumor size measured by MRI in response to IM treatment in GIST-T1 xenografts. Our studies revealed statistically significant increases in apoptosis due to IM treatment using both probes as early as 24 h post IM treatment which was confirmed by IHC. Molecular imaging will allow for faster and more effective screening of novel therapies in preclinical GIST models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.