Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24755550›Full record

ArticlePLoS medicine2014

Fetal growth and risk of stillbirth: a population-based case-control study.

Radek Bukowski, Nellie I Hansen, Marian Willinger, Uma M Reddy, Corette B Parker, Halit Pinar, Robert M Silver, Donald J Dudley, Barbara J Stoll, George R Saade and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 72 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
72citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
25.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

72 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 191 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The performance of growth charts in well term newborns in screening for hypoglycemia.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Prediction of small-for-gestational age and fetal growth restriction at routine ultrasound examination at 35-37 weeks' gestation.Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology · 2025
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

12 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 10 institutions in 1 country.

Radek BukowskiUniversity of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, United States of America.
Nellie I HansenRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Marian WillingerThe Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Uma M ReddyThe Pregnancy and Perinatology Branch, the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America.
Corette B ParkerRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Halit PinarBrown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Robert M SilverUniversity of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Donald J DudleyUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, United States of America.
Barbara J StollEmory University School of Medicine and Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
George R SaadeUniversity of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, United States of America.
Matthew A KochRTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, United States of America.
Carol J Rowland HogueRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.
Michael W VarnerUniversity of Utah School of Medicine and Intermountain Health Care, Salt Lake City, Utah, United States of America.
Deborah L ConwayUniversity of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, United States of America.
Donald CoustanBrown University School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, United States of America.
Robert L GoldenbergColumbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United States of America.
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Stillbirth Collaborative Research Network
RTI International · USEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development · USIntermountain Healthcare · USThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio · USThe University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston · USBrown University · USChildren's Healthcare of Atlanta · USColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USEmory University · USJohn Brown University · US

Funding

Stillbirth NetworkU01HD045954 · NICHD · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI PARKER, CORETTE BREEDEN · 2003 to 2009
$8.4M
Research on the Scope and Causes of Stillbirth in the USU10HD045944 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI SILVER, ROBERT M. · 2003 to 2009
$2.7M
Research on the Scope and Causes of Stillbirth in the USU10HD045925 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI HOGUE, CAROL · 2003 to 2009
$2.3M
RESEARCH ON SCOPE &CAUSES OF STILLBIRTH IN THE USU10HD045953 · NICHD · WOMEN AND INFANTS HOSPITAL-RHODE ISLAND · PI COUSTAN, DONALD R · 2003 to 2009
$2.3M
Scope and Causes of StillbirthU10HD045952 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BR GALVESTON · PI SAADE, GEORGE R. · 2003 to 2009
$1.9M
NICHD NIH HHS U01 HD045954NICHD NIH HHS U01-HD045954NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD045925NICHD NIH HHS U10-HD045925NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD045944NICHD NIH HHS U10-HD045944NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD045952NICHD NIH HHS U10-HD045952NICHD NIH HHS U10 HD045953NICHD NIH HHS U10-HD045953PHS HHS U10-HDO45955
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundStillbirth is strongly related to impaired fetal growth. However, the relationship between fetal growth and stillbirth is difficult to determine because of uncertainty in the timing of death and confounding characteristics affecting normal fetal growth. METHODS AND

findingsWe conducted a population-based case-control study of all stillbirths and a representative sample of live births in 59 hospitals in five geographic areas in the US. Fetal growth abnormalities were categorized as small for gestational age (SGA) (<10th percentile) or large for gestational age (LGA) (>90th percentile) at death (stillbirth) or delivery (live birth) using population, ultrasound, and individualized norms. Gestational age at death was determined using an algorithm that considered the time-of-death interval, postmortem examination, and reliability of the gestational age estimate. Data were weighted to account for the sampling design and differential participation rates in various subgroups. Among 527 singleton stillbirths and 1,821 singleton live births studied, stillbirth was associated with SGA based on population, ultrasound, and individualized norms (odds ratio [OR] [95% CI]: 3.0 [2.2 to 4.0]; 4.7 [3.7 to 5.9]; 4.6 [3.6 to 5.9], respectively). LGA was also associated with increased risk of stillbirth using ultrasound and individualized norms (OR [95% CI]: 3.5 [2.4 to 5.0]; 2.3 [1.7 to 3.1], respectively), but not population norms (OR [95% CI]: 0.6 [0.4 to 1.0]). The associations were stronger with more severe SGA and LGA (<5th and >95th percentile). Analyses adjusted for stillbirth risk factors, subset analyses excluding potential confounders, and analyses in preterm and term pregnancies showed similar patterns of association. In this study 70% of cases and 63% of controls agreed to participate. Analysis weights accounted for differences between consenting and non-consenting women. Some of the characteristics used for individualized fetal growth estimates were missing and were replaced with reference values. However, a sensitivity analysis using individualized norms based on the subset of stillbirths and live births with non-missing variables showed similar findings.

conclusionsStillbirth is associated with both growth restriction and excessive fetal growth. These findings suggest that, contrary to current practices and recommendations, stillbirth prevention strategies should focus on both severe SGA and severe LGA pregnancies. Please see later in the article for the Editors' Summary.

Indexed as

Birth WeightGestational AgeAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleFetal DevelopmentHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornInfant, Small for Gestational AgeLive BirthPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRisk FactorsStillbirthUnited States

Identifiers

PMID24755550
PMCPMC3995658
OpenAlexW2042387472

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.