Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24755315›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2014

Vascular measurements correlate with estrogen receptor status.

Mark C Lloyd, Khalid O Alfarouk, Daniel Verduzco, Marilyn M Bui, Robert J Gillies, Muntaser E Ibrahim, Joel S Brown, Robert A Gatenby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The possible role of methylglyoxal metabolism in cancer.Journal of enzyme inhibition and medicinal chemistry · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Targeting acidity in cancer and diabetes.Biochimica et biophysica acta. Reviews on cancer · 2019
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Mark C LloydH, Lee Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL 33612, USA. Mark.Lloyd@moffitt.org.
Khalid O Alfarouk
Daniel Verduzco
Marilyn M Bui
Robert J Gillies
Muntaser E Ibrahim
Joel S Brown
Robert A Gatenby
Moffitt Cancer Center · USUniversity of Illinois Chicago · USUniversity of Khartoum · SD

Funding

TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCHP30CA076292 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA · PI KENNETH Lynn WRIGHT · 1998 to 2026
$93.5M
The Physi(ologi)cal Microenvironment and its Role in Tumor Invasion and MetastaseU54CA143970 · NCI · H. LEE MOFFITT CANCER CTR & RES INST · PI GATENBY, ROBERT A · 2009 to 2014
$9.3M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA076292NCI NIH HHS U54CA143970
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast carcinoma can be classified as either Estrogen Receptor (ER) positive or negative by immunohistochemical phenotyping, although ER expression may vary from 1 to 100% of malignant cells within an ER + tumor. This is similar to genetic variability observed in other tumor types and is generally viewed as a consequence of intratumoral evolution driven by random genetic mutations. Here we view cellular evolution within tumors as a classical Darwinian system in which variations in molecular properties represent predictable adaptations to spatially heterogeneous environmental selection forces. We hypothesize that ER expression is a successful adaptive strategy only if estrogen is present in the microenvironment. Since the dominant source of estrogen is blood flow, we hypothesized that, in general, intratumoral regions with higher blood flow would contain larger numbers of ER + cells when compared to areas of low blood flow and in turn necrosis.

methodsThis study used digital pathology whole slide image acquisition and advanced image analysis algorithms. We examined the spatial distribution of ER + and ER- cells, vascular density, vessel area, and tissue necrosis within histological sections of 24 breast cancer specimens. These data were correlated with the patients ER status and molecular pathology report findings.

resultsANOVA analyses revealed a strong correlation between vascular area and ER expression and between high fractional necrosis and absent ER expression (R(2) = 39%; p < 0.003 and R(2) = 46%; p < 0.001), respectively). ER expression did not correlate with tumor grade or size.

conclusionWe conclude that ER expression can be understood as a Darwinian process and linked to variations in estrogen delivery by temporal and spatial heterogeneity in blood flow. This correlation suggests strategies to promote intratumoral blood flow or a cyclic introduction of estrogen in the treatment schedule could be explored as a counter-intuitive approach to increase the efficacy of anti-estrogen drugs.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogensFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansNecrosisNeovascularization, PathologicSelection, GeneticTumor MicroenvironmentESR1 protein, humanEstrogen Receptor alphaEstrogens

Identifiers

PMID24755315
PMCPMC4012762
OpenAlexW2094433138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.