Trial reportTrials2014
One or two trainees per workplace in a structured multimodality training curriculum for laparoscopic surgery? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial - DRKS00004675.
Trial report in Trials, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Virtual reality simulation in robot-assisted surgery: meta-analysis of skill transfer and predictability of skill.BJS open · 2021Pooled it
- Video-based training of situation awareness enhances minimally invasive surgical performance: a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Telestration with augmented reality improves surgical performance through gaze guidance.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Video-based learning of coping strategies for common errors improves laparoscopy training-a randomized study.Surgical endoscopy · 2023Trial
- Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is superior to laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the initial training for surgical novices in an ex vivo porcine model: a randomized crossover study.Surgical endoscopy · 2022Trial
- One or two trainees per workplace for laparoscopic surgery training courses: results from a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2019Trial
- LapTrain: multi-modality training curriculum for laparoscopic cholecystectomy-results of a randomized controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2018Trial
- Validation of the mobile serious game application Touch Surgery™ for cognitive training and assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Trial
- Trial
- Sequential learning of psychomotor and visuospatial skills for laparoscopic suturing and knot tying-a randomized controlled trial "The Shoebox Study" DRKS00008668.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2016Trial
- Trial
- The bibliometric analysis of extended reality in surgical training: Global and Chinese perspective.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Benchtop simulation of the retrosigmoid approach: Validation of a surgical simulator and development of a task-specific outcome measure score.World neurosurgery: X · 2023Article
- Virtual Reality as an Affirmative Spin-Off to Laparoscopic Training: An Updated Review.Cureus · 2021Review
- The Applications of Virtual Reality Technology in Medical Groups Teaching.Journal of advances in medical education & professionalism · 2018Article
- Conception of the Lübeck Toolbox curriculum for basic minimally invasive surgery skills.Langenbeck's archives of surgery · 2018Article
- Development and validation of a sensor- and expert model-based training system for laparoscopic surgery: the iSurgeon.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Face validity of the pulsatile organ perfusion trainer for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Surgical endoscopy · 2017Article
- Learning from the surgeon's real perspective - First-person view versus laparoscopic view in e-learning for training of surgical skills? Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.International journal of surgery protocols · 2017Article
- [Risk awareness and training for prevention of complications in minimally invasive surgery].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundLaparoscopy training courses have been established in many centers worldwide to ensure adequate skill learning before performing operations on patients. Different training modalities and their combinations have been compared regarding training effects. Multimodality training combines different approaches for optimal training outcome. However, no standards currently exist for the number of trainees assigned per workplace.
methodsThis is a monocentric, open, three-arm randomized controlled trial. The participants are laparoscopically-naive medical students from Heidelberg University. After a standardized introduction to laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with online learning modules, the participants perform a baseline test for basic skills and LC performance on a virtual reality (VR) trainer. A total of 100 students will be randomized into three study arms, in a 2:2:1 ratio. The intervention groups participate individually (Group 1) or in pairs (Group 2) in a standardized and structured multimodality training curriculum. Basic skills are trained on the box and VR trainers. Procedural skills and LC modules are trained on the VR trainer. The control group (Group C) does not receive training between tests. A post-test is performed to reassess basic skills and LC performance on the VR trainer. The performance of a cadaveric porcine LC is then measured as the primary outcome using standardized and validated ratings by blinded experts with the Objective Structured Assessment of Technical Skills. The Global Operative Assessment of Laparoscopic Surgical skills score and the time taken for completion are used as secondary outcome measures as well as the improvement of skills and VR LC performance between baseline and post-test. Cognitive tests and questionnaires are used to identify individual factors that might exert influence on training outcome. DISCUSSION: This study aims to assess whether workplaces in laparoscopy training courses for beginners should be used by one trainee or two trainees simultaneously, by measuring the impact on operative performance and learning curves. Possible factors of influence, such as the role of observing the training partner, exchange of thoughts, active reflection, model learning, motivation, pauses, and sympathy will be explored in the data analysis. This study will help optimize the efficiency of laparoscopy training courses. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: DRKS00004675.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.