Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24754318›Full record

Trial reportEpilepsia2014

The long-term effect of vagus nerve stimulation on quality of life in patients with pharmacoresistant focal epilepsy: the PuLsE (Open Prospective Randomized Long-term Effectiveness) trial.

Philippe Ryvlin, Frank G Gilliam, Dang K Nguyen, Gabriella Colicchio, Alfonso Iudice, Paolo Tinuper, Nelia Zamponi, Umberto Aguglia, Louis Wagner, Lorella Minotti and 6 more

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Epilepsia, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT00522418 (An Open Prospective Randomised Long-Term Effectiveness Study, Comparing Best Medical Practice With or Without Adjunctive VNS Therapy in Patients 16 Years and Older With Pharmaco-resistant Partial Epilepsy), which is not on this map. Cited by 71 papers, 8 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed, 8 pooled it
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00522418 phase4terminatednot on this map

An Open Prospective Randomised Long-Term Effectiveness Study, Comparing Best Medical Practice With or Without Adjunctive VNS Therapy in Patients 16 Years and Older With Pharmaco-resistant Partial Epilepsy

TypeinterventionalSponsorCyberonics, Inc.Ran2006 to 2008Enrolled122ConditionsEpilepsy, Partial EpilepsyArmsVagal Nerve Simulation (VNS) Therapy, Best Medical Practive
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed, 8 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 189 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Vagus Nerve Stimulation in Movement Disorders, from Principles to a Systematic Review of Evidence.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Antidepressant effect of vagal nerve stimulation in epilepsy patients: a systematic review.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Meta-analysis of vagus nerve stimulation treatment for epilepsy: correlation between device setting parameters and acute response.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2015
    Pooled it
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Observational
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 15 institutions in 7 countries.

Philippe RyvlinTIGER, CRNL, INSERM U1028, CNRS 5292 and Hospices Civils de Lyon and Claude Bernard Lyon-1 University, Lyon, France.
Frank G Gilliam
Dang K Nguyen
Gabriella Colicchio
Alfonso Iudice
Paolo Tinuper
Nelia Zamponi
Umberto Aguglia
Louis Wagner
Lorella Minotti
Hermann Stefan
Paul Boon
Mark Sadler
Paolo Benna
Pradheep Raman
Emilio Perucca
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRDalhousie University · CAGhent University · BEHôpital Notre-Dame · CAKempenhaeghe · NLMagna Graecia University · ITOspedali Riuniti di Ancona · ITPennsylvania State University · USUniversità Cattolica del Sacro Cuore · ITUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEUniversité Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRUniversity of Bologna · ITUniversity of Pavia · ITUniversity of Pisa · ITUniversity of Turin · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo evaluate whether vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) as adjunct to best medical practice (VNS + BMP) is superior to BMP alone in improving long-term health-related quality of life (HRQoL).

methodsPuLsE (Open Prospective Randomized Long-term Effectiveness) was a prospective, randomized, parallel-group, open-label, and long-term effectiveness study (conducted at 28 sites in Europe and Canada). Adults with pharmacoresistant focal seizures (n = 112) received VNS + BMP or BMP (1:1 ratio). Medications and VNS parameters could be adjusted as clinically indicated for optimal seizure control while minimizing adverse effects. Primary endpoint was mean change from baseline HRQoL (using Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory-89 total score; QOLIE-89). Secondary endpoints included changes in seizure frequency, responder rate (≥50% decrease in seizure frequency), Centre for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D), Neurological Disorders Depression Inventory-Epilepsy scale (NDDI-E), Clinical Global Impression-Improvement scale (CGI-I), Adverse Event Profile (AEP), and antiepileptic drug (AED) load. The study was prematurely terminated due to recruitment difficulties prior to completing the planned enrollment of n = 362. Results for n = 96 who had baseline and at least one follow-up QOLIE-89 assessment (from months 3-12) were included in this analysis. Mixed model repeated measures (MMRM) analysis of variance was performed on change from baseline for the primary and secondary endpoints.

resultsSignificant between-group differences in favor of VNS + BMP were observed regarding improvement in HRQoL, seizure frequency, and CGI-I score (respective p-values < 0.05, 0.03, and 0.01). More patients in the VNS + BMP group (43%) reported adverse events (AEs) versus BMP group (21%) (p = 0.01), a difference reflecting primarily mostly transient AEs related to VNS implantation or stimulation. No significant difference between treatment groups was observed for changes in CES-D, NDDI-E, AEP, and AED load. SIGNIFICANCE: VNS therapy as a treatment adjunct to BMP in patients with pharmacoresistant focal seizures was associated with a significant improvement in HRQoL compared with BMP alone. A PowerPoint slide summarizing this article is available for download in the Supporting Information section here.

Indexed as

Vagus Nerve StimulationAdolescentAdultAgedAnticonvulsantsDrug ResistanceEpilepsies, PartialFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQuality of LifeTreatment OutcomeYoung AdultAnticonvulsantsEpilepsyHealth-related quality of lifeQOLIE-89SeizuresVagus nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID24754318
PMCPMC4283995
OpenAlexW2020216633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.