Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24753984›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

Phase I trial to evaluate the tumor and normal tissue uptake, radiation dosimetry and safety of (111)In-DTPA-human epidermal growth factor in patients with metastatic EGFR-positive breast cancer.

Katherine A Vallis, Raymond M Reilly, Deborah Scollard, Pat Merante, Anthony Brade, Sobi Velauthapillai, Curtis Caldwell, Ida Chan, Marc Freeman, Gina Lockwood and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Cellular lethal damage ofFrontiers in medicine · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Radionuclides for Targeted Therapy: Physical Properties.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Development of NovelJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. In Vitro Evaluation of No-Carrier-Added Radiolabeled Cisplatin ([International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Article
  16. Synthesis of no-carrier-added [Scientific reports · 2021
    Article
  17. AnChemical science · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Auger electrons for cancer therapy - a review.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2019
    Review
  20. Targeting Micrometastases: The Effect of Heterogeneous Radionuclide Distribution on Tumor Control Probability.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Katherine A VallisGray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Raymond M ReillyLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto Toronto, Canada ; Toronto General Hospital Research Institute Toronto, Canada ; Medical Imaging, University of Toronto Toronto, Canada.
Deborah ScollardLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto Toronto, Canada.
Pat MeranteRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto Canada.
Anthony BradeRadiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Hospital, University of Toronto Canada.
Sobi VelauthapillaiLeslie Dan Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Toronto Toronto, Canada.
Curtis CaldwellMedical Imaging, University of Toronto Toronto, Canada ; Medical Physics, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center Toronto, Canada.
Ida ChanMedical Imaging, University of Toronto Toronto, Canada.
Marc FreemanMedical Imaging, University of Toronto Toronto, Canada.
Gina LockwoodBiostatistics, Princess Margaret Hospital Toronto, Canada.
Naomi A MillerPathology, University Health Network Toronto, Canada.
Bart CornelissenGray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford Oxford, UK.
Jennifer PetronisMedical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Hospital Toronto, Canada.
Kathryn SabateBiostatistics, Princess Margaret Hospital Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 11564Cancer Research UK 16466Cancer Research UK A10072
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The safety, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of (111)In-DTPA-hEGF, an Auger electron-emitting radiopharmaceutical, were evaluated in a first-in-human trial. Dose escalation was performed in patients with EGFR-positive metastatic breast cancer who had received ≥2 prior courses of systemic treatment. (111)In-DTPA-hEGF (0.25 mg) was administered once intravenously (i.v.). Blood was collected for biochemistry/hematology testing and pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity analyses at selected times post injection (p.i.). Whole body planar images were acquired at 1, 4-6, 24 and 72 h p.i. and SPECT images at 24 and/or 72 h p.i. Macrodosimetry (MIRD) for the whole body and organs was estimated using OLINDA. Correlative radiological imaging was obtained at baseline, 1 and 3 months and then 6 monthly. Toxicity was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)v2.0. Sixteen patients, median age 47 yr (range, 35-59), received (111)In-DTPA-hEGF as follows: 357-434 MBq (7), 754-805 MBq (3), 1,241-1,527 MBq (3) and 2,030-2,290 MBq (3). Fifteen were evaluable for toxicity. The commonest adverse events (AE) were flushing, chills, nausea, and vomiting occurring during or immediately p.i. One patient experienced Grade 3 thrombocytopenia (attributed to bone marrow infiltration by cancer). There were no other Grade 3 or 4 AEs. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Clear accumulation of radiopharmaceutical in at least one known site of disease was observed in 47% of patients. (111)In-DTPA-hEGF was cleared biexponentially from the blood with α-phase T½ of 0.16 ± 0.03 h and β-phase T½ of 9.41 ± 1.93 h. (111)In-DTPA-hEGF was not immunogenic. The mean radiation dose estimates in mGy/MBq for whole body, liver, kidneys, spleen and thyroid were 0.08, 0.86, 0.74, 0.37 and 0.30, respectively. No objective antitumor responses were observed at the doses studied. In summary, administered amounts of up to 2,290 MBq (0.25 mg) of (111)In-DTPA-hEGF were well tolerated as a single i.v. injection.

Indexed as

111In-DTPA-hEGFAuger electronbreast cancerPhase I trial

Identifiers

PMID24753984
PMCPMC3992211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.