ArticleAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014
Phase I trial to evaluate the tumor and normal tissue uptake, radiation dosimetry and safety of (111)In-DTPA-human epidermal growth factor in patients with metastatic EGFR-positive breast cancer.
Article in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Contemporary opportunities and potential of Auger electron-emitting theranostics.Theranostics · 2026Review
- In Vitro and In Vivo Radiotoxicity and Biodistribution of Thallium-201 Delivered to Cancer Cells by Prussian Blue Nanoparticles.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Platinum group metals for nuclear medicine, a luxurious dream or the future of imaging and therapy: a review.Frontiers in nuclear medicine · 2025Review
- In Vitro and Preclinical Systematic Dose-Effect Studies of Auger Electron- and β Particle-Emitting Radionuclides and External Beam Radiation for Cancer Treatment.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2024Article
- DNA Repair Inhibitors: Potential Targets and Partners for Targeted Radionuclide Therapy.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- A Review of Theranostics: Perspectives on Emerging Approaches and Clinical Advancements.Radiology. Imaging cancer · 2023Review
- Cellular lethal damage ofFrontiers in medicine · 2023Article
- Formulation of a kit under Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) for preparing [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2022Article
- Radionuclides for Targeted Therapy: Physical Properties.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Toward Bifunctional Chelators for Thallium-201 for Use in Nuclear Medicine.Bioconjugate chemistry · 2022Article
- Searching for a Paradigm Shift in Auger-Electron Cancer Therapy with Tumor-Specific Radiopeptides Targeting the Mitochondria and/or the Cell Nucleus.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- Development of NovelJournal of medicinal chemistry · 2022Article
- Targeted Radionuclide Therapy Using Auger Electron Emitters: The Quest for the Right Vector and the Right Radionuclide.Pharmaceutics · 2021Article
- In Vitro Evaluation of No-Carrier-Added Radiolabeled Cisplatin ([International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Article
- Synthesis of no-carrier-added [Scientific reports · 2021Article
- AnChemical science · 2020Article
- Auger radiopharmaceutical therapy targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen in a micrometastatic model of prostate cancer.Theranostics · 2020Article
- Auger electrons for cancer therapy - a review.EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2019Review
- Targeting Micrometastases: The Effect of Heterogeneous Radionuclide Distribution on Tumor Control Probability.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The safety, pharmacokinetics, biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of (111)In-DTPA-hEGF, an Auger electron-emitting radiopharmaceutical, were evaluated in a first-in-human trial. Dose escalation was performed in patients with EGFR-positive metastatic breast cancer who had received ≥2 prior courses of systemic treatment. (111)In-DTPA-hEGF (0.25 mg) was administered once intravenously (i.v.). Blood was collected for biochemistry/hematology testing and pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity analyses at selected times post injection (p.i.). Whole body planar images were acquired at 1, 4-6, 24 and 72 h p.i. and SPECT images at 24 and/or 72 h p.i. Macrodosimetry (MIRD) for the whole body and organs was estimated using OLINDA. Correlative radiological imaging was obtained at baseline, 1 and 3 months and then 6 monthly. Toxicity was scored using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE)v2.0. Sixteen patients, median age 47 yr (range, 35-59), received (111)In-DTPA-hEGF as follows: 357-434 MBq (7), 754-805 MBq (3), 1,241-1,527 MBq (3) and 2,030-2,290 MBq (3). Fifteen were evaluable for toxicity. The commonest adverse events (AE) were flushing, chills, nausea, and vomiting occurring during or immediately p.i. One patient experienced Grade 3 thrombocytopenia (attributed to bone marrow infiltration by cancer). There were no other Grade 3 or 4 AEs. Maximum tolerated dose was not reached. Clear accumulation of radiopharmaceutical in at least one known site of disease was observed in 47% of patients. (111)In-DTPA-hEGF was cleared biexponentially from the blood with α-phase T½ of 0.16 ± 0.03 h and β-phase T½ of 9.41 ± 1.93 h. (111)In-DTPA-hEGF was not immunogenic. The mean radiation dose estimates in mGy/MBq for whole body, liver, kidneys, spleen and thyroid were 0.08, 0.86, 0.74, 0.37 and 0.30, respectively. No objective antitumor responses were observed at the doses studied. In summary, administered amounts of up to 2,290 MBq (0.25 mg) of (111)In-DTPA-hEGF were well tolerated as a single i.v. injection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24753984PMC3992211What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.