Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24753979›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2014

Bioorthogonal chemistry: implications for pretargeted nuclear (PET/SPECT) imaging and therapy.

James C Knight, Bart Cornelissen

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 42 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
42citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

42 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Single Photon Emission Computed Tomography Tracer.Recent results in cancer research. Fortschritte der Krebsforschung. Progres dans les recherches sur le cancer · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James C KnightCR-UK/MRC Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford Oxford, OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom ; Radiobiology Research Institute, Churchill Hospital Oxford, OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom.
Bart CornelissenCR-UK/MRC Gray Institute for Radiation Oncology and Biology, University of Oxford Oxford, OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom ; Radiobiology Research Institute, Churchill Hospital Oxford, OX3 7LJ, United Kingdom.

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16466
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to their rapid and highly selective nature, bioorthogonal chemistry reactions are attracting a significant amount of recent interest in the radiopharmaceutical community. Over the last few years, reactions of this type have found tremendous utility in the construction of new radiopharmaceuticals and as a method of bioconjugation. Furthermore, reports are beginning to emerge in which these reactions are also being applied in vivo to facilitate a novel pretargeting strategy for the imaging and therapy of cancer. The successful implementation of such an approach could lead to dramatic improvements in image quality, therapeutic index, and reduced radiation dose to non-target organs and tissues. This review will focus on the potential of various bioorthogonal chemistry reactions to be used successfully in such an approach.

Indexed as

bioorthogonal chemistryclick chemistrymolecular imagingPETPretargetingSPECT

Identifiers

PMID24753979
PMCPMC3992206

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.