Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24753950›Full record

ArticleFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2013

We may not have it all together, but together we have it all. The importance of intra- and interdisciplinary collaboration.

R Campo, Y Van Belle, G Grimbizis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

R CampoEuropean Academy for Gynecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Y Van BelleEuropean Academy for Gynecological Surgery, Diestsevest 43/0001, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
G Grimbizis21st Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Ring Road, N.Efkarpia, 54603, Thessaloniki, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The tremendous development of knowledge, the accumulation of clinical experience, and the enriching of everyday practice with the results of basic and clinical research created the need for splitting medicine in specialities and sub-specialities. Although this evolution is inevitable in order to meet the complex needs and demands of patients, we have to be aware of the risk of neglecting the holistic approach of a person in distress. Indeed, the organ-focused and pathology-centred approach of a patient may not exempt us of the rudiments of care such as the notion that a human being is more than the sum of its parts. This involves the absolute obligation for intra and inter-disciplinary cooperation. Recently, the European leading societies in Gynaecology, the European Board Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (EBCOG), the European Society of Human reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE), the European Society for Gynaecological Endoscopy (ESGE) and the European Academy for Gynaecological Surgery (+he Academy), have established some common impressive initiatives to improve women's health care. As a result of an intensive research programme coordinated by +he Academy with a multidisciplinary team of gynaecologists and surgeons a unique structured training and certification programme in endoscopic surgery is established. This project is a fine example making the dream of multidisciplinary approach reality and achieving some most impressive results. It is without any doubt a major step forwards in the improvement of the quality -assurance in endoscopic surgery in benefit of the patients care and has been accepted by our leading European and national societies. Recently, ESGE and ESHRE developed a new classification on female genital anomalies. An evidence-based -updated new classification published in the official journal of both societies was the ended result. THIS CREATIVE, SUCCESSFUL AND UNEVENTFUL COLLABORATION UNDERLINES THE NEED FOR RESPECTING SOME CRUCIAL POINTS: to clearly outline the topic of common action, to find the working platform, to define the method and to respect -independence of each society by clarifying the borders and the responsibilities. Keeping the window of the collaboration open is crucial for keeping the window to medicine of the future unlocked.

Indexed as

Basic researchcertification programmeclassification systemsclinical researchcollaborationgynaecologymultidisciplinarysocietiestraining

Identifiers

PMID24753950
PMCPMC3987375

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.