ReviewFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2011
Laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy.
Review in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Vaginal packing after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy and surgical outcome after one year: A randomized controlled trial.Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica · 2025Trial
- Laparoscopic mesh sacr ocolpopexy versus lateral vaginal vault suspension in prevention of post hysterectomy vault prolapse: a randomized trial.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2025Article
- Vaginal Vault Prolapse in an Elderly Woman.Cureus · 2023Article
- Laparoscopic approach to recurrence following multiple surgeries for external rectal prolapse: a case report.Surgical case reports · 2021Article
- Laparoscopic approach to pelvic organ prolapse - the way to go or a blind alley?Wideochirurgia i inne techniki maloinwazyjne = Videosurgery and other miniinvasive techniques · 2019Review
- Characterization of the median sacral artery course at the sacral promontory using contrast-enhanced computed tomography.International urogynecology journal · 2017Article
- Device Selection Contributes to Operative Time Reduction in Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Vesicovaginal Adhesion as an Independent Factor of Postoperative Recurrence after Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyArticle
- Current Treatments for Female Pelvic Floor Dysfunctions.Gynecology and minimally invasive therapyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laparoscopy offers great exposure and surgical detail, reduces blood loss and the need for excessive abdominal packing-- and bowel manipulation making it an excellent modality to perform pelvic floor surgery. Laparoscopic repair of level I or apical vaginal prolapse may be challenging, due to the need for extensive dissection and advanced suturing skills. However, it offers the efficacy of open abdominal sacrocolpopexy, such as lower recurrence rates and less dyspareunia-- than sacrospinous fixation, as well as the reduced morbidity of a laparoscopic approach.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24753860PMC3991455What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.