ReviewFacts, views & vision in ObGyn2011
Imaging the fetal central nervous system.
Review in Facts, views & vision in ObGyn, 2011. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multimodal assessment of fetal head circumference and biparietal diameter: systematic differences between MRI and US measurements and development of an US-equivalent prediction regression model.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Fetal Congenital Anomalies: Multi-Regional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation with Prenatal Ultrasound Correlation.Turkish archives of pediatrics · 2025Article
- Temporal changes in epidemiological profile and fetal indications for late termination of pregnancy: a retrospective single-center study.Archives of gynecology and obstetrics · 2021Article
- Fetal brain issues in congenital heart disease.Translational pediatrics · 2021Review
- Detecting Fetal Central Nervous System Anomalies Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Ultrasound.Medical archives (Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina) · 2021Article
- Validation of a semiautomated volumetric approach for fetal neurosonography using 5DCNS+ in clinical data from > 1100 consecutive pregnancies.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2020Article
- Cerebrospinal Fluid and Parenchymal Brain Development and Growth in the Healthy Fetus.Developmental neuroscience · 2016Article
- First Trimester Neurosonogram-Our Experience.Current health sciences journalArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The low prevalence of fetal central nervous system anomalies results in a restricted level of exposure and limited experience-- for most of the obstetricians involved in prenatal ultrasound. Sonographic guidelines for screening the fetal brain in a systematic way will probably increase the detection rate and enhance a correct referral to a tertiary care center, offering the patient a multidisciplinary approach of the condition. This paper aims to elaborate on prenatal sonographic and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) diagnosis and outcome of various central nervous system malformations. Detailed neurosonographic investigation has become available through high resolution vaginal ultrasound probes and the development of a variety of 3D ultrasound modalities e.g. ultrasound tomographic imaging. In addition, fetal MRI is particularly helpful in the detection of gyration and neurulation-- anomalies and disorders of the gray and white matter.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24753859PMC3991457What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.