ArticleInternational journal of clinical and experimental medicine2014
Classification and surgical management for the axis fracture complicated with adjacent segment instability.
Article in International journal of clinical and experimental medicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Does tea consumption correlate to risk of fracture? A meta-analysis.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Review
- Correlation of bone fragments reposition and related parameters in thoracolumbar burst fractures patients.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015Article
- Short segment screw fixation without fusion in treatment for unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2014Article
- Functional outcome in unstable Hangman's fracture managed with anterior approach: A prospective study.Journal of craniovertebral junction & spineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study was to classify the axis fracture complicated with adjacent segment instability and to explore its significance to surgical management. 42 patients (25 males and 17 females) with axis fractures with an average age of 44.14 years (range, 23 to 65) who received surgery between January 2006 and June 2012 were analyzed retrospectively. Results suggest that all patients underwent surgery safely without spinal cord injury, cerebrospinal fluid leakage or vertebral artery injury. The average follow up was 18 months (12-48 months). There was significant difference (t = 2.339, P = 0.011) in JOA score between pre-operation (13.10 ± 4.51) and post-operation time points (15.24 ± 3.86). 1-2 degree improvement of neurofunction was achieved in all except 1 Frankel B. After operation, all patients were immobilized in a hard collar for 3 months. Fusion was achieved in all cases (mean 4.5 months). X-ray showed no malposition of the screws. No instrument failure was noted during follow up. Thus, axis fracture complicated with adjacent segment instability should be treated individually based on the fracture type and adjacent segment instability. Our classification can be used to guide the surgical management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24753760PMC3992405W1693528497What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.