Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24753601›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Particularism and the retreat from theory in the archaeology of agricultural origins.

Kristen J Gremillion, Loukas Barton, Dolores R Piperno

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The archaeology of climate change: The case for cultural diversity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  4. Theoretical plurality, the extended evolutionary synthesis, and archaeology.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ecology of a widespread large omnivore,Ecology and evolution · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The global geography of human subsistence.Royal Society open science · 2018
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Assessing elements of an extended evolutionary synthesis for plant domestication and agricultural origin research.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  16. Article
  17. The development of plant food processing in the Levant: insights from use-wear analysis of Early Epipalaeolithic ground stone tools.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Optimal foraging theory and niche-construction theory do not stand in opposition.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
  20. Reply to Mohlenhoff et al.: Human behavioral ecology needs a rethink that niche-construction theory can provide.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kristen J GremillionDepartment of Anthropology, Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210.
Loukas Barton
Dolores R Piperno

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction of new analytic methods and expansion of research into previously untapped regions have greatly increased the scale and resolution of data relevant to the origins of agriculture (OA). As a result, the recognition of varied historical pathways to agriculture and the continuum of management strategies have complicated the search for general explanations for the transition to food production. In this environment, higher-level theoretical frameworks are sometimes rejected on the grounds that they force conclusions that are incompatible with real-world variability. Some of those who take this position argue instead that OA should be explained in terms of local and historically contingent factors. This retreat from theory in favor of particularism is based on the faulty beliefs that complex phenomena such as agricultural origins demand equally complex explanations and that explanation is possible in the absence of theoretically based assumptions. The same scholars who are suspicious of generalization are reluctant to embrace evolutionary approaches to human behavior on the grounds that they are ahistorical, overly simplistic, and dismissive of agency and intent. We argue that these criticisms are misplaced and explain why a coherent theory of human behavior that acknowledges its evolutionary history is essential to advancing understanding of OA. Continued progress depends on the integration of human behavior and culture into the emerging synthesis of evolutionary developmental biology that informs contemporary research into plant and animal domestication.

Indexed as

Models, TheoreticalAgricultureArchaeologyBehaviorBiological EvolutionCultureHistory, AncientHumansbehavioral ecologyevolutionary theory

Identifiers

PMID24753601
PMCPMC4035987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.