Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24753594›Full record

ReviewProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Defining functional DNA elements in the human genome.

Manolis Kellis, Barbara Wold, Michael P Snyder, Bradley E Bernstein, Anshul Kundaje, Georgi K Marinov, Lucas D Ward, Ewan Birney, Gregory E Crawford, Job Dekker and 20 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 373 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
373citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
44.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

373 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 743 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pervasive cryptic selection in the human noncoding genome.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. One Biology and the Status of Humans.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

313 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 3 countries.

Manolis KellisComputer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139.
Barbara Wold
Michael P Snyder
Bradley E Bernstein
Anshul Kundaje
Georgi K Marinov
Lucas D Ward
Ewan Birney
Gregory E Crawford
Job Dekker
Ian Dunham
Laura L Elnitski
Peggy J Farnham
Elise A Feingold
Mark Gerstein
Morgan C Giddings
David M Gilbert
Thomas R Gingeras
Eric D Green
Roderic Guigo
Tim Hubbard
Jim Kent
Jason D Lieb
Richard M Myers
Michael J Pazin
Bing Ren
John A Stamatoyannopoulos
Zhiping Weng
Kevin P White
Ross C Hardison
California Institute of Technology · USEuropean Bioinformatics Institute · GBMassachusetts Institute of Technology · USNational Human Genome Research Institute · USNational Institutes of Health · USUniversity of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USBroad Institute · USCentre for Genomic Regulation · ESCold Spring Harbor Laboratory · USDuke Medical Center · USFlorida State University · USHudsonAlpha Institute for Biotechnology · USLudwig Cancer Research · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USPennsylvania State University · USPrinceton University · USStanford University · USUniversity of California, Santa Cruz · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Southern California · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Single-Cell Biology Shared ResourceP30CA045508 · NCI · COLD SPRING HARBOR LABORATORY · PI John Edward Moses · 1987 to 2026
$118.9M
Regulatory and epigenetic landscapes reveal biological processes, disease mechanisms and diagnostic markersZIAHG200323 · NHGRI · NATIONAL HUMAN GENOME RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI ELNITSKI, LAURA L · 2009 to 2025
$27.6M
GENCODE Resource ProjectU41HG007234 · NHGRI · SANGER INSTITUTE · PI FLICEK, PAUL · 2013 to 2020
$20.3M
Structural Annotation of the Human GenomeR01HG003143 · NHGRI · UNIV OF MASSACHUSETTS MED SCH WORCESTER · PI Job Dekker · 2003 to 2026
$15.4M
Production Center for Mapping Regulatory Regions of the Human GenomeU54HG006996 · NHGRI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, MICHAEL P. · 2012 to 2016
$14.6M
Center for Mammalian Regulatory GenomicsU54HG006997 · NHGRI · LUDWIG INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES LTD · PI REN, BING · 2012 to 2016
$14.3M
Genome Plasticity during ES Cell Differentiation to Neural LineagesR01GM083337 · NIGMS · SAN DIEGO BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI David M Gilbert · 2007 to 2026
$6.1M
Ras Induced Senescence and Tumor SuppressionR01AG016379 · NIA · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI LOWE, SCOTT W. · 1999 to 2014
$5.6M
Regulatory Morif Discovery in the Human Genome Using Comparative GenomicsR01HG004037 · NHGRI · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI KELLIS, MANOLIS · 2007 to 2015
$3.9M
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With the completion of the human genome sequence, attention turned to identifying and annotating its functional DNA elements. As a complement to genetic and comparative genomics approaches, the Encyclopedia of DNA Elements Project was launched to contribute maps of RNA transcripts, transcriptional regulator binding sites, and chromatin states in many cell types. The resulting genome-wide data reveal sites of biochemical activity with high positional resolution and cell type specificity that facilitate studies of gene regulation and interpretation of noncoding variants associated with human disease. However, the biochemically active regions cover a much larger fraction of the genome than do evolutionarily conserved regions, raising the question of whether nonconserved but biochemically active regions are truly functional. Here, we review the strengths and limitations of biochemical, evolutionary, and genetic approaches for defining functional DNA segments, potential sources for the observed differences in estimated genomic coverage, and the biological implications of these discrepancies. We also analyze the relationship between signal intensity, genomic coverage, and evolutionary conservation. Our results reinforce the principle that each approach provides complementary information and that we need to use combinations of all three to elucidate genome function in human biology and disease.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionDiseaseDNAGenome, HumanHumansRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSoftwareDNA

Identifiers

PMID24753594
PMCPMC4035993
OpenAlexW2007203150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.