Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24753576›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2014

Genomic and cranial phenotype data support multiple modern human dispersals from Africa and a southern route into Asia.

Hugo Reyes-Centeno, Silvia Ghirotto, Florent Détroit, Dominique Grimaud-Hervé, Guido Barbujani, Katerina Harvati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Testing the utility of dental morphological trait combinations for inferring human neutral genetic variation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2020
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hugo Reyes-CentenoPaleoanthropology, Senckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Paleoenvironment, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, D-72070 Tübingen, Germany;
Silvia GhirottoDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy; and.
Florent DétroitDepartment of Prehistory, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7194, National Museum of Natural History, F-75005 Paris, France.
Dominique Grimaud-HervéDepartment of Prehistory, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Unité Mixte de Recherche 7194, National Museum of Natural History, F-75005 Paris, France.
Guido BarbujaniDepartment of Life Sciences and Biotechnology, University of Ferrara, I-44121 Ferrara, Italy; and.
Katerina HarvatiPaleoanthropology, Senckenberg Center for Human Evolution and Paleoenvironment, Eberhard Karls University of Tübingen, D-72070 Tübingen, Germany; katerina.harvati@ifu.uni-tuebingen.de.

Funding

European Research Council 295733
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite broad consensus on Africa as the main place of origin for anatomically modern humans, their dispersal pattern out of the continent continues to be intensely debated. In extant human populations, the observation of decreasing genetic and phenotypic diversity at increasing distances from sub-Saharan Africa has been interpreted as evidence for a single dispersal, accompanied by a series of founder effects. In such a scenario, modern human genetic and phenotypic variation was primarily generated through successive population bottlenecks and drift during a rapid worldwide expansion out of Africa in the Late Pleistocene. However, recent genetic studies, as well as accumulating archaeological and paleoanthropological evidence, challenge this parsimonious model. They suggest instead a "southern route" dispersal into Asia as early as the late Middle Pleistocene, followed by a separate dispersal into northern Eurasia. Here we test these competing out-of-Africa scenarios by modeling hypothetical geographical migration routes and assessing their correlation with neutral population differentiation, as measured by genetic polymorphisms and cranial shape variables of modern human populations from Africa and Asia. We show that both lines of evidence support a multiple-dispersals model in which Australo-Melanesian populations are relatively isolated descendants of an early dispersal, whereas other Asian populations are descended from, or highly admixed with, members of a subsequent migration event.

Indexed as

Human MigrationAfricaAsiaBiological EvolutionFounder EffectGenomicsGeographyHumansModels, GeneticPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotidePopulation DynamicsSkullSoftwarecranial diversitygenome diversityhuman evolutionmodern human originsSNPs

Identifiers

PMID24753576
PMCPMC4034217

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.