Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24753413›Full record

ArticleNucleic acids research2014

High-efficiency genome editing via 2A-coupled co-expression of fluorescent proteins and zinc finger nucleases or CRISPR/Cas9 nickase pairs.

Katarzyna Duda, Lindsey A Lonowski, Michael Kofoed-Nielsen, Adriana Ibarra, Catherine M Delay, Qiaohua Kang, Zhang Yang, Shondra M Pruett-Miller, Eric P Bennett, Hans H Wandall and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nucleic acids research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Improving and Streamlining Gene Editing inJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Enrichment strategies to enhance genome editing.Journal of biomedical science · 2023
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Synthetic polycistronic sequences in eukaryotes.Synthetic and systems biotechnology · 2021
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Site-specificThe Journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Article
  18. The Journal of biological chemistry · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Katarzyna DudaBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC) and Centre for Epigenetics, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Lindsey A LonowskiBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC) and Centre for Epigenetics, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Michael Kofoed-NielsenBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC) and Centre for Epigenetics, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Adriana IbarraBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC) and Centre for Epigenetics, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Catherine M DelayBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC) and Centre for Epigenetics, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Qiaohua KangSigma-Aldrich Biotechnology, Gene Regulation, 2909 Laclede Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63103, USA.
Zhang YangDepartments of Odontology and Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, the Panum Institute 24.6.38, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Shondra M Pruett-MillerSigma-Aldrich Biotechnology, Gene Regulation, 2909 Laclede Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63103, USA.
Eric P BennettDepartments of Odontology and Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, the Panum Institute 24.6.38, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Hans H WandallDepartments of Odontology and Cellular and Molecular Medicine, Copenhagen Center for Glycomics, the Panum Institute 24.6.38, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark.
Gregory D DavisSigma-Aldrich Biotechnology, Gene Regulation, 2909 Laclede Avenue, Saint Louis, MO 63103, USA.
Steen H HansenGI Cell Biology Research Laboratory, Boston Children's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, 300 Longwood Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Morten FrödinBiotech Research and Innovation Centre (BRIC) and Centre for Epigenetics, University of Copenhagen, Ole Maaløes vej 5, 2200 Copenhagen N, Denmark morten.frodin@bric.ku.dk.

Funding

STRUCTURE-FUNCTION RELATIONSHIPS IN THE ALIMENTARY TRACTP30DK034854 · NIDDK · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI JONATHAN C KAGAN · 1986 to 2026
$32.4M
Cadherin-regulated apoptosis and survival signaling in epithelial cellsR01CA142647 · NCI · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI HANSEN, STEEN HENNING · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA142647NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK034854
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Targeted endonucleases including zinc finger nucleases (ZFNs) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPRs)/Cas9 are increasingly being used for genome editing in higher species. We therefore devised a broadly applicable and versatile method for increasing editing efficiencies by these tools. Briefly, 2A peptide-coupled co-expression of fluorescent protein and nuclease was combined with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) to allow for efficient isolation of cell populations with increasingly higher nuclease expression levels, which translated into increasingly higher genome editing rates. For ZFNs, this approach, combined with delivery of donors as single-stranded oligodeoxynucleotides and nucleases as messenger ribonucleic acid, enabled high knockin efficiencies in demanding applications, including biallelic codon conversion frequencies reaching 30-70% at high transfection efficiencies and ∼ 2% at low transfection efficiencies, simultaneous homozygous knockin mutation of two genes with ∼ 1.5% efficiency as well as generation of cell pools with almost complete codon conversion via three consecutive targeting and FACS events. Observed off-target effects were minimal, and when occurring, our data suggest that they may be counteracted by selecting intermediate nuclease levels where off-target mutagenesis is low, but on-target mutagenesis remains relatively high. The method was also applicable to the CRISPR/Cas9 system, including CRISPR/Cas9 mutant nickase pairs, which exhibit low off-target mutagenesis compared to wild-type Cas9.

Indexed as

Gene Knock-In TechniquesCell Line, TumorCell SeparationCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDeoxyribonucleasesFlow CytometryFluorescent DyesGenomeHumansK562 CellsLuminescent ProteinsPeptidesPlasmidsZinc FingersCRISPR-Associated ProteinsDeoxyribonucleasesFluorescent DyesLuminescent ProteinsPeptides

Identifiers

PMID24753413
PMCPMC4041425

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.