Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24753146›Full record

ArticleHippocampus2014

The hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and selective memory retrieval: evidence from a rodent model of the retrieval-induced forgetting effect.

Jade Q Wu, Greg J Peters, Pedro Rittner, Thomas A Cleland, David M Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hippocampus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Dopamine Modulates Adaptive Forgetting in Medial Prefrontal Cortex.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Prefrontal-hippocampal interactions supporting the extinction of emotional memories: the retrieval stopping model.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Review
  8. Understanding the dynamic and destiny of memories.Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jade Q WuDepartment of Psychology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York.
Greg J Peters
Pedro Rittner
Thomas A Cleland
David M Smith
Cornell University · US

Funding

Hippocampus, Retrosplenial Cortex and Contextual Learning and MemoryR01MH083809 · NIMH · CORNELL UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, DAVID M., WARDEN, MELISSA RHOADS · 2010 to 2022
$3.6M
NIMH NIH HHS MH083809NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH083809
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhibition is an important component of many cognitive functions, including memory. For example, the retrieval-induced forgetting (RIF) effect occurs when extra practice with some items from a study list inhibits the retrieval of the nonpracticed items relative to a baseline condition that does not involve extra practice. Although counterintuitive, the RIF phenomenon may be important for resolving interference by inhibiting potentially competing retrieval targets. Neuroimaging studies suggest that the hippocampus and prefrontal cortex are involved in the RIF effect, but controlled lesion studies have not yet been performed. We developed a rodent model of the RIF training procedure and trained control rats and rats with temporary inactivation of the hippocampus or medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). Rats were trained on a list of odor cues, presented in cups of digging medium with a buried reward, followed by additional practice trials with a subset of the cues. We then tested the rats' memories for the cues and their association with reward by presenting them with unbaited cups containing the test odorants and measuring how long they persisted in digging. Control rats exhibited a robust RIF effect in which memory for the nonpracticed odors was significantly inhibited. Thus, extra practice with some odor cues inhibited memory for the others, relative to a baseline condition that involved an identical amount of training. Inactivation of either the hippocampus or the mPFC blocked the RIF effect. We also constructed a computational model of a representational learning circuit to simulate the RIF effect. We show in this model that "sideband suppression" of similar memory representations can reproduce the RIF effect and that alteration of the suppression parameters and learning rate can reproduce the lesion effects seen in our rats. Our results suggest that the RIF effect is widespread and that inhibitory processes are an important feature of memory function.

Indexed as

Practice, PsychologicalAnimalsAssociation LearningComputer SimulationCuesExecutive FunctionGABA-A Receptor AgonistsHippocampusMaleMemoryModels, NeurologicalMotor ActivityMuscimolNeuropsychological TestsOdorantsOlfactory PerceptionGABA-A Receptor AgonistsMuscimolhippocampusinterferenceprefrontal cortexretrieval inhibition

Identifiers

PMID24753146
PMCPMC4146680
OpenAlexW2141573614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.