Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24753128›Full record

Trial reportPediatric blood & cancer2014

Randomization is not associated with socio-economic and demographic factors in a multi-center clinical trial of children with sickle cell anemia.

Dionna O Roberts, Brittany Covert, Mark J Rodeghier, Nagina Parmar, Michael R DeBaun, Alexis A Thompson, Robert I Liem

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatric blood & cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Review
  7. Mistrust of Pediatric Sickle Cell Disease Clinical Trials Research.American journal of preventive medicine · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dionna O Roberts *Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Brittany Covert *Department of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Mark J RodeghierRodeghier Consultants, Chicago, IL.
Nagina ParmarDivision of Hematology/Oncology, Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, ON.
Michael R DeBaunDepartment of Pediatrics, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, TN.
Alexis A ThompsonDivision of Hematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplant, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.
Robert I LiemDivision of Hematology, Oncology & Stem Cell Transplant, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL; Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine.

Funding

Silent Cerebral Infarct Multi-Center Clinical TrialU01NS042804 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI DEBAUN, MICHAEL R. · 2003 to 2010
$20.7M
NINDS NIH HHS 5U01-NS042804-07NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS042804
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFew studies have investigated factors influencing participation rates for minority children with a chronic disease in clinical trials. The Silent Cerebral Infarct Multi-Center Clinical (SIT) Trial provides an opportunity to study the impact of demographic and socio-economic factors on randomization in a clinical trial among Black children. Our primary objective was to characterize the factors associated with successful randomization of children with sickle cell disease (SCD) and silent cerebral infarct (SCI) in the SIT Trial after initial consent. PROCEDURE: Differences in socio-economic and demographic variables, family history and disease-related variables were determined between eligible participants who were successfully randomized and those who were not randomized following initial consent. Head of household educational level and family income were examined separately for US versus non-US sites.

resultsOf 1,176 children enrolled in the SIT Trial, 1,016 (86%) completed screening. Of 208 (20%) children with qualifying SCI on pre-randomization MRI, 196 (94%) were successfully randomized. There were no differences in socio-economic, demographic, or disease-related variables between children who were or were not randomized. Participants from non-US sites were more likely to be randomized (22% vs. 12%, P = 0.011); although, randomization by country was associated with neither head of household education nor family income.

conclusionIn the SIT Trial, acceptance of random allocation was not associated with socio-economic or demographic factors. Although these factors may represent barriers for some participants, they should not bias investigators caring for children with SCD in their approach to recruitment for clinical trial participation.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionAdolescentAnemia, Sickle CellCerebral InfarctionChildChild, PreschoolDemographyFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMalePrognosisSocioeconomic Factorsclinical trialsrandomizationresearch participationsickle cell diseasestudy recruitment

Identifiers

PMID24753128
PMCPMC4107131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.