ArticleJournal of assisted reproduction and genetics2014
Human embryo cryopreservation: one-step slow freezing does it all?
Article in Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePrevious studies have shown that a modified one-step slow freezing method with higher sucrose concentration (0.2 M) can achieve higher embryo and blastomere survival rates that are comparable to vitrification. However, no study has evaluated the efficacy of a one-step method using commercial slow freezing kit without altering its composition. This retrospective study examines the effects of using 1.5 M PROH with 0.1 M sucrose (F2 medium) alone in a one-step slow freezing method compared to the conventional two-step method.
methodsCleavage stage embryos from 526 thaw cycles previously cryopreserved by either the conventional two-step slow freezing method or the modified one-step method were studied. The embryo and blastomere survival rates, cleavage rate, clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate were compared between the two groups.
resultsThe results showed that the embryo survival rate was significantly higher in the modified one-step method compared to the conventional two-step method (86.9 % and 83.1 %, respectively; p = 0.04). Total blastomere survival rate was also significantly increased as a result of the modification (81.0 % versus 76.5 %; p < 0.001). However, there was no statistical difference in the cleavage rates, clinical pregnancy rates (CPR/ET) and live birth rates between the two methods.
conclusionsSlow freezing using the one-step method is superior to the conventional two-step method in terms of embryo and blastomere survival rates without affecting cleavage rate and clinical outcomes. It can be routinely applied to cleavage stage embryo cryopreservation in IVF centres for greater workflow efficiency.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.