ArticleRheumatology international2014
Clinical trials in systemic lupus erythematosus: a status report on ongoing trials.
Article in Rheumatology international, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Impact of T Cell Vaccination in Alleviating and Regulating Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Manifestation.Journal of immunology research · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To describe the characteristics of trials in systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) listed in ClinicalTrials.gov such as study design, funding sources and aspects of the disease and drugs under investigation. We conducted a survey of ongoing clinical trials that were registered in the ClinicalTrials.gov website. We used the advanced search option and applied the following inclusion criteria, "SLE," "open studies," "interventional," and "adults 18 years or older." Of 97 eligible studies, 34.0 % were phase 3 or 4, 49.5 % were phase 1, 2 or 2/3 and in 16.5 %, we could not determine the study phase. Most trials were randomized (69.0 %) and 48.4 % were double blinded; 34 % of the trials were placebo controlled, 19.6 % had an active agent comparator and 46.4 % had no comparator. Universities and pharmaceutical industries were the primary sponsors for 45.3 and 39.1 % of the trials, respectively, and government agencies for 10.3 %. Multi-center trials based in the USA (US) accounted for 40.2 % of the trials, 46.4 % were outside of the US and 13.4 % were in the US as well as other countries. The most frequently used endpoint was drug efficacy (30.9 %) followed by disease severity indices (25.7 %), drug safety (14.4 %), remission rates and times to remission (7.2 %), and inflammatory markers and antibody titers (7.2 %). The majority of ongoing clinical trials in SLE are university or industry-funded, randomized phase 1, 2, or 2/3 trials, focused on drug efficacy. Federal funding for trials in SLE within and outside the US remains low.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.