Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24752440›Full record

SynthesisThe Cochrane database of systematic reviews2014

Physical activity programs for promoting bone mineralization and growth in preterm infants.

Sven M Schulzke, Siree Kaempfen, Daniel Trachsel, Sanjay K Patole

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The Cochrane database of systematic reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03374033 (Effect of High Protein and High Energy Intakes and Physical Activity on Growth and Body Composition of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03374033 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Effect of High Protein and High Energy Intakes and Physical Activity on Growth and Body Composition of Extremely Low Birth Weight Infants: a Randomised Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversità Politecnica delle MarcheRan2017 to 2022Enrolled200ConditionsInfant, Very Low Birth WeightArmsNUTR +, STIMUL +
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Prevention and management of metabolic bone disease of prematurity: a systematic review.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. NICU sensory experiences associated with positive outcomes: an integrative review of evidence from 2015-2020.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. [Expert consensus on the follow-up management of bronchopulmonary dysplasia in preterm infants after discharge].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022
    Article
  14. Expert consensus on clinical management of metabolic bone disease of prematurity (2021).Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Metabolic Bone Disease in Premature Neonates: An Unmet ChallengeJournal of clinical research in pediatric endocrinology · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Stresses and strains on the human fetal skeleton during development.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sven M SchulzkeDepartment of Neonatology, University of Basel Children's Hospital (UKBB), Spitalstrasse 21, Basel, Switzerland, 4031.
Siree Kaempfen
Daniel Trachsel
Sanjay K Patole

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLack of physical stimulation may contribute to metabolic bone disease of preterm infants, resulting in poor bone mineralization and growth. Physical activity programs combined with adequate nutrition might help to promote bone mineralization and growth.

objectivesThe primary objective was to assess whether physical activity programs in preterm infants improve bone mineralization and growth and reduce the risk of fracture.The secondary objectives included other potential benefits in terms of length of hospital stay, skeletal deformities and neurodevelopmental outcomes, and adverse events.Subgroup analysis:• Given that the smallest infants are most vulnerable for developing osteopenia (Bishop 1999), a subgroup analysis was planned for infants with birth weight < 1000 g.• Calcium and phosphorus intake may affect an infant's ability to increase bone mineral content (Kuschel 2004). Therefore, an additional subgroup analysis was planned for infants receiving different amounts of calcium and phosphorus, along with full enteral feeds as follows. ∘ Below 100 mg/60 mg calcium/phosphorus or equal to/above 100 mg/60 mg calcium/phosphorus per 100 mL milk. ∘ Supplementation of calcium without phosphorus. ∘ Supplementation of phosphorus without calcium. SEARCH

methodsThe standard search strategy of the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group (CNRG) was used. The search included the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (2012, Issue 9), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL (1966 to March 2013), and cross-references, as well as handsearching of abstracts of the Society for Pediatric Research and the International Journal of Sports Medicine. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing physical activity programs (extension and flexion, range-of-motion exercises) versus no organized physical activity programs in preterm infants. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data collection, study selection, and data analysis were performed according to the methods of the CNRG. MAIN

resultsEleven trials enrolling 324 preterm infants (gestational age 26 to 34 weeks) were included in this review. All were small (N = 16 to 50) single-center studies that evaluated daily physical activity for three and one-half to eight weeks during initial hospitalization. Methodological quality and reporting of included trials were variable.Four trials demonstrated moderate short-term benefits of physical activity for bone mineralization at completion of the physical activity program. The only trial assessing long-term effects on bone mineralization showed no effect of physical activity administered during initial hospitalization on bone mineralization at 12 months corrected age. Meta-analysis from four trials demonstrated a positive effect of physical activity on daily weight gain (weighted mean difference (WMD) 2.21 g/kg/d, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23 to 3.19). Data from four trials showed a positive effect on linear growth (WMD 0.12 cm/wk, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.24) but not on head growth (WMD -0.03 cm/wk, 95% CI -0.14 to 0.08) during the study period. Only one trial reported on fractures (this outcome did not occur in intervention and control groups) and complications of preterm birth (no significant differences between intervention and control groups). None of the trials assessed other outcomes relevant to this review. AUTHORS'

conclusionsSome evidence suggests that physical activity programs might promote short-term weight gain and bone mineralization in preterm infants. Data are inadequate to allow assessment of harm or long-term effects. Current evidence does not support the routine use of physical activity programs in preterm infants. Further trials incorporating infants with a high baseline risk of osteopenia are required. These trials should address adverse events, long-term outcomes, and the effects of nutritional intake (calories, protein, calcium, phosphorus).

Indexed as

Bone DensityBone Diseases, MetabolicCalcification, PhysiologicHumansInfantInfant, NewbornInfant, PrematureMotor ActivityMusculoskeletal ManipulationsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicWeight Gain

Identifiers

PMID24752440
PMCPMC11008108

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.