Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24752154›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

A comparison of the rest complex binding patterns in embryonic stem cells and epiblast stem cells.

Masahide Seki, Hideki Masaki, Takako Arauchi, Hiromitsu Nakauchi, Sumio Sugano, Yutaka Suzuki

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Masahide SekiDepartment of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Hideki MasakiDivision of Stem Cell Therapy, Center for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Takako ArauchiDepartment of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Hiromitsu NakauchiDivision of Stem Cell Therapy, Center for Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine, Institute of Medical Science, the University of Tokyo, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
Sumio SuganoDepartment of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Yutaka SuzukiDepartment of Medical Genome Sciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, the University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We detected and characterized the binding sites of the representative Rest complex components Rest, Sin3A, and Lsd1. We compared their binding patterns in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells and epiblast stem (EpiS) cells. We found few Rest sites unique to the EpiS cells. The ES-unique site features were distinct from those of the common sites, namely, the signal intensities were weaker, and the characteristic gene function categories differed. Our analyses showed that the Rest binding sites do not always overlap with the Sin3A and Lsd1 binding sites. The Sin3A binding pattern differed remarkably between the ES and EpiS cells and was accompanied by significant changes in acetylated-histone patterns in the surrounding regions. A series of transcriptome analyses in the same cell types unexpectedly showed that the putative target gene transcript levels were not dramatically different despite dynamic changes in the Rest complex binding patterns and chromatin statuses, which suggests that Rest is not the sole determinant of repression at its targets. Nevertheless, we identified putative Rest targets with explicitly enhanced transcription upon Rest knock-down in 143 and 60 common and ES-unique Rest target genes, respectively. Among such sites, several genes are involved in ES cell proliferation. In addition, we also found that long, intergenic non-coding RNAs were apparent Rest targets and shared similar features with the protein-coding target genes. Interestingly, such non-coding target genes showed less conservation through evolution than protein-coding targets. As a result of differences in the components and targets of the Rest complex, its functional roles may differ in ES and EpiS cells.

Indexed as

AnimalsBinding SitesChromatinChromatin ImmunoprecipitationEmbryonic Stem CellsGene Knockdown TechniquesGerm LayersHistone DemethylasesMiceOxidoreductases, N-DemethylatingProtein BindingRE1-Silencing Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingSin3 Histone Deacetylase and Corepressor ComplexTranscription, GeneticChromatinHistone DemethylasesKDM1a protein, mouseOxidoreductases, N-DemethylatingRE1-Silencing Transcription FactorRepressor ProteinsRNA, Long NoncodingSIN3A transcription factorSin3 Histone Deacetylase and Corepressor Complex

Identifiers

PMID24752154
PMCPMC3994037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.