Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24751979›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

The molecular evolution of cytochrome P450 genes within and between drosophila species.

Robert T Good, Lydia Gramzow, Paul Battlay, Tamar Sztal, Philip Batterham, Charles Robin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Copy number variation contributes to parallel local adaptation in an invasive plant.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The P450 genes of the cat flea,Current research in insect science · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Robert T GoodDepartment of Genetics, University of Melbourne, AustraliaPresent address: Department of Genetics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Philosophenweg 12, Jena, GermanyPresent address: School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Lydia GramzowPresent address: Department of Genetics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Philosophenweg 12, Jena, Germany.
Paul BattlayDepartment of Genetics, University of Melbourne, AustraliaPresent address: Department of Genetics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Philosophenweg 12, Jena, GermanyPresent address: School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Tamar SztalPresent address: School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Philip BatterhamDepartment of Genetics, University of Melbourne, AustraliaPresent address: Department of Genetics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Philosophenweg 12, Jena, GermanyPresent address: School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia.
Charles RobinDepartment of Genetics, University of Melbourne, AustraliaPresent address: Department of Genetics, Friedrich Schiller University Jena, Philosophenweg 12, Jena, GermanyPresent address: School of Biological Sciences, Monash University, Australia crobin@unimelb.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We map 114 gene gains and 74 gene losses in the P450 gene family across the phylogeny of 12 Drosophila species by examining the congruence of gene trees and species trees. Although the number of P450 genes varies from 74 to 94 in the species examined, we infer that there were at least 77 P450 genes in the ancestral Drosophila genome. One of the most striking observations in the data set is the elevated loss of P450 genes in the Drosophila sechellia lineage. The gain and loss events are not evenly distributed among the P450 genes-with 30 genes showing no gene gains or losses whereas others show as many as 20 copy number changes among the species examined. The P450 gene clades showing the fewest number of gene gain and loss events tend to be those evolving with the most purifying selection acting on the protein sequences, although there are exceptions, such as the rapid rate of amino acid replacement observed in the single copy phantom (Cyp306a1) gene. Within D. melanogaster, we observe gene copy number polymorphism in ten P450 genes including multiple cases of interparalog chimeras. Nonallelic homologous recombination (NAHR) has been associated with deleterious mutations in humans, but here we provide a second possible example of an NAHR event in insect P450s being adaptive. Specifically, we find that a polymorphic Cyp12a4/Cyp12a5 chimera correlates with resistance to an insecticide. Although we observe such interparalog exchange in our within-species data sets, we have little evidence of it between species, raising the possibility that such events may occur more frequently than appreciated but are masked by subsequent sequence change.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularAdaptation, PhysiologicalAmino Acid SubstitutionAnimalsBase SequenceCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDrosophilaDrosophila ProteinsGene DeletionGene DosageGenome, InsectHomologous RecombinationModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataMultigene FamilyPhylogenyCytochrome P-450 Enzyme SystemDrosophila ProteinsCyp12a4Cyp6a20cytochrome P450Drosophila Genetic Reference Panelnonallelic homologous recombinationphantom

Identifiers

PMID24751979
PMCPMC4040991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.