Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24751784›Full record

ReviewmAbs

Separation of mAbs molecular variants by analytical hydrophobic interaction chromatography HPLC: overview and applications.

Mark Haverick, Selina Mengisen, Mohammed Shameem, Alexandre Ambrogelly

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in mAbs. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
11.5field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 133 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Current advances in separation chemistry for antibody purification and analysis.Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. A comprehensive overview of recent advances in generative models for antibodies.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mark Haverick
Selina Mengisen
Mohammed Shameem
Alexandre Ambrogelly
Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (United States) · USOceanside Public Library · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Hydrophobic interaction chromatography-high performance liquid chromatography (HIC-HPLC) is a powerful analytical method used for the separation of molecular variants of therapeutic proteins. The method has been employed for monitoring various post-translational modifications, including proteolytic fragments and domain misfolding in etanercept (Enbrel®); tryptophan oxidation, aspartic acid isomerization, the formation of cyclic imide, and α amidated carboxy terminus in recombinant therapeutic monoclonal antibodies; and carboxy terminal heterogeneity and serine fucosylation in Fc and Fab fragments. HIC-HPLC is also a powerful analytical technique for the analysis of antibody-drug conjugates. Most current analytical columns, methods, and applications are described, and critical method parameters and suitability for operation in regulated environment are discussed, in this review.

Indexed as

Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic InteractionsAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalChromatography, High Pressure LiquidGlycosylationHumansImmunoglobulin Constant RegionsImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsRecombinant ProteinsAntibodies, MonoclonalImmunoglobulin Constant RegionsImmunoglobulin Fab FragmentsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24751784
PMCPMC4171020
OpenAlexW1991780880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.