Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24751286›Full record

Observational studyCritical care (London, England)2014

Continuous endotracheal tube cuff pressure control system protects against ventilator-associated pneumonia.

Leonardo Lorente, María Lecuona, Alejandro Jiménez, Lisset Lorenzo, Isabel Roca, Judith Cabrera, Celina Llanos, María L Mora

2 registry-linked trialsOpen access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Critical care (London, England), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05918172 completednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Comparison of the Frequency of Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia in Intubated Patients Followed Up With Automatic Cuff Pressure Controller and Manual Cuff Pressure Controller in Pediatric Intensive Care; A Randomized Controlled Study

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorIstanbul Medeniyet UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled241ConditionsVentilator-associated PneumoniaArmsendotracheal cuff pressure manual measurement, endotracheal cuff pressure automatic measurement
NCT07017205 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Automated Versus Manual Cuff Pressure Control for Preventing Microaspiration With TaperGuard Endotracheal Tubes in Elective Surgery: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorArgentinian Intensive Care SocietyRan2026 to 2026Enrolled72ConditionsEndotracheal Tube Cuff, Microaspiration, Endotracheal Tube Cuff PressureArmsApplication of oropharyngeal dye and tracheal aspirate collection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Rebound Inverts theAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Leonardo Lorente
María Lecuona
Alejandro Jiménez
Lisset Lorenzo
Isabel Roca
Judith Cabrera
Celina Llanos
María L Mora
Hospital Universitario de Canarias · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe use of a system for continuous control of endotracheal tube cuff pressure reduced the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in one randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 112 patients but not in another RCT with 142 patients. In several guidelines on the prevention of VAP, the use of a system for continuous or intermittent control of endotracheal cuff pressure is not reviewed. The objective of this study was to compare the incidence of VAP in a large sample of patients (n = 284) treated with either continuous or intermittent control of endotracheal tube cuff pressure.

methodsWe performed a prospective observational study of patients undergoing mechanical ventilation during more than 48 hours in an intensive care unit (ICU) using either continuous or intermittent endotracheal tube cuff pressure control. Multivariate logistic regression analysis (MLRA) and Cox proportional hazard regression analysis were used to predict VAP. The magnitude of the effect was expressed as odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR), respectively, and 95% confidence interval (CI).

resultsWe found a lower incidence of VAP with the continuous (n = 150) than with the intermittent (n = 134) pressure control system (22.0% versus 11.2%; p = 0.02). MLRA showed that the continuous pressure control system (OR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.22-0.89; p = 0.02) and the use of an endotracheal tube incorporating a lumen for subglottic secretion drainage (SSD) (OR = 0.39; 95% CI = 0.19-0.84; p = 0.02) were protective factors against VAP. Cox regression analysis showed that the continuous pressure control system (HR = 0.45; 95% CI = 0.24-0.84; p = 0.01) and the use of an endotracheal tube incorporating a lumen for SSD (HR = 0.29; 95% CI = 0.15-0.56; p < 0.001) were protective factors against VAP. However, the interaction between type of endotracheal cuff pressure control system (continuous or intermittent) and endotracheal tube (with or without SSD) was not statistically significant in MLRA (OR = 0.41; 95% CI = 0.07-2.37; p = 0.32) or in Cox analysis (HR = 0.35; 95% CI = 0.06-1.84; p = 0.21).

conclusionsThe use of a continuous endotracheal cuff pressure control system and/or an endotracheal tube with a lumen for SSD could help to prevent VAP in patients requiring more than 48 hours of mechanical ventilation.

Indexed as

AdultAgedFemaleHumansIntubation, IntratrachealMaleMiddle AgedPneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedProspective StudiesRespiration, Artificial

Identifiers

PMID24751286
PMCPMC4057071
OpenAlexW2171084429

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.