Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24750780›Full record

Trial reportInternational wound journal2015

The cost-benefit of using soft silicone multilayered foam dressings to prevent sacral and heel pressure ulcers in trauma and critically ill patients: a within-trial analysis of the Border Trial.

Nick Santamaria, Wei Liu, Marie Gerdtz, Sarah Sage, Jane McCann, Amy Freeman, Theresa Vassiliou, Stephanie DeVincentis, Ai W Ng, Elizabeth Manias and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in International wound journal, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
10.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2024
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Dressings and topical agents for preventing pressure ulcers.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2018
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Prophylactic Sacral Dressing in Prevention of Pressure Injury among ICU Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A review on equipped hospital beds with wireless sensor networks for reducing bedsores.Journal of research in medical sciences : the official journal of Isfahan University of Medical Sciences · 2015
    Review
  19. Effectiveness and Value of Prophylactic 5-Layer Foam Sacral Dressings to Prevent Hospital-Acquired Pressure Injuries in Acute Care Hospitals: An Observational Cohort Study.Journal of wound, ostomy, and continence nursing : official publication of The Wound, Ostomy and Continence Nurses Society
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nick SantamariaDepartment of Nursing, Royal Melbourne Hospital & University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Wei LiuEmergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital & University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Marie GerdtzEmergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital & University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Sarah SageDepartment of Nursing, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Jane McCannDepartment of Podiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Amy FreemanDepartment of Podiatry, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Theresa VassiliouEmergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital & University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Stephanie DeVincentisDepartment of Nursing, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Ai W NgDepartment of Nursing, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia.
Elizabeth ManiasDepartment of Nursing, Royal Melbourne Hospital & University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Jonathan KnottEmergency Department, Royal Melbourne Hospital & University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
Danny LiewEpiCentre, Royal Melbourne Hospital & University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.
The Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUUniversity of Melbourne · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Little is known about the cost-benefit of soft silicone foam dressings in pressure ulcer (PU) prevention among critically ill patients in the emergency department (ED) and intensive care unit (ICU). A randomised controlled trial to assess the efficacy of soft silicone foam dressings in preventing sacral and heel PUs was undertaken among 440 critically ill patients in an acute care hospital. Participants were randomly allocated either to an intervention group with prophylactic dressings applied to the sacrum and heels in the ED and changed every 3 days in the ICU or to a control group with standard PU prevention care provided during their ED and ICU stay. The results showed a significant reduction of PU incidence rates in the intervention group (P = 0·001). The intervention cost was estimated to be AU$36·61 per person based on an intention-to-treat analysis, but this was offset by lower downstream costs associated with PU treatment (AU$1103·52). Therefore, the average net cost of the intervention was lower than that of the control (AU$70·82 versus AU$144·56). We conclude that the use of soft silicone multilayered foam dressings to prevent sacral and heel PUs among critically ill patients results in cost savings in the acute care hospital.

Indexed as

BandagesCost-Benefit AnalysisCritical IllnessFemaleHeelHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPressure UlcerSacrumSiliconesSiliconesCost-benefitPressure ulcersProphylactic dressings

Identifiers

PMID24750780
PMCPMC7951001
OpenAlexW1790164140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.