Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24750421›Full record

ReviewClinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases2019

Transportation capacity for patients with highly infectious diseases in Europe: a survey in 16 nations.

S Schilling, H C Maltezou, F M Fusco, G De Iaco, H-R Brodt, B Bannister, P Brouqui, G Carson, V Puro, R Gottschalk and 2 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Clinical microbiology and infection : the official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

S SchillingDepartment for Infectious Diseases, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany. Electronic address: stefan.schilling@kgu.de.
H C MaltezouDepartment for Interventions in Health-Care Facilities, Hellenic Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Athens, Greece.
F M FuscoDepartment for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani" (INMI), Rome, Italy.
G De IacoDepartment for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani" (INMI), Rome, Italy.
H-R BrodtDepartment for Infectious Diseases, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
B BannisterDepartment for Infectious Diseases, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.
P BrouquiResearch Unit on Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases (URMITE), Marseilles, France.
G CarsonDepartment for Infectious Diseases, Health Protection Agency, UK.
V PuroDepartment for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani" (INMI), Rome, Italy.
R GottschalkDepartment of Health, Frankfurt, Germany.
G IppolitoDepartment for Infectious Diseases, National Institute for Infectious Diseases "L. Spallanzani" (INMI), Rome, Italy.
EuroNHID Study-group
Goethe University Frankfurt · DEHellenic Center for Disease Control & Prevention · GRThe Royal Free Hospital · GBUnité de Recherche sur les Maladies Infectieuses et Tropicales Emergentes · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Highly infectious diseases (HIDs) are defined as being transmissible from person to person, causing life-threatening illnesses and presenting a serious public health hazard. In most European Union member states specialized isolation facilities are responsible for the management of such cases. Ground ambulances are often affiliated with those facilities because rapid relocation of patients is most desirable. To date, no pooled data on the accessibility, technical specifications and operational procedures for such transport capacities are available. During 2009, the 'European Network for HIDs' conducted a cross-sectional analysis of hospitals responsible for HID patients in Europe including an assessment of (a) legal aspects; (b) technical and infrastructure aspects; and (c) operational procedures for ground ambulances used for HID transport. Overall, 48 isolation facilities in 16 European countries were evaluated and feedback rates ranged from 78% to 100% (n = 37 to n = 48 centres). Only 46.8% (22/47) of all centres have both national and local guidelines regulating HID patient transport. If recommended, specific equipment is found in 90% of centres (9/10), but standard ambulances in only 6/13 centres (46%). Exclusive entrances (32/45; 71%) and pathways (30/44; 68.2%) for patient admission, as well as protocols for disinfection of ambulances (34/47; 72.3%) and equipment (30/43; 69.8%) exist in most centres. In conclusion, the availability and technical specifications of ambulances broadly differ, reflecting different preparedness levels within the European Union. Hence, regulations for technical specifications and operational procedures should be harmonized to promote patient and healthcare worker safety.

Indexed as

AmbulancesCommunicable DiseasesCross-Sectional StudiesDisinfectionEuropeHealth Care SurveysHospitals, IsolationHumansInfection ControlPatient IsolationTransportation of PatientsAmbulancesCommunicable diseasesCritical pathwayEuropean UnionInfection controlPatient isolationTransportation of patients

Identifiers

PMID24750421
PMCPMC7128608
OpenAlexW2110941197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.