Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24749624›Full record

ArticleACS combinatorial science2014

Utility of redundant combinatorial libraries in distinguishing high and low quality screening hits.

Todd M Doran, Yu Gao, Kimberly Mendes, Sonja Dean, Scott Simanski, Thomas Kodadek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS combinatorial science, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Building Block-Based Binding Predictions for DNA-Encoded Libraries.Journal of chemical information and modeling · 2023
    Article
  3. Synthesis and Screening of a DNA-Encoded Library of Non-Peptidic Macrocycles.Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English) · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Beyond protein binding: recent advances in screening DNA-encoded libraries.Chemical communications (Cambridge, England) · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Activity-Based DNA-Encoded Library Screening.ACS combinatorial science · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Xenoprotein engineering via synthetic libraries.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Tumor-targeting peptides from combinatorial libraries.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Todd M DoranDepartments of Chemistry and Cancer Biology, The Scripps Research Institute , 130 Scripps Way, Jupiter, Florida 33458, United States.
Yu Gao
Kimberly Mendes
Sonja Dean
Scott Simanski
Thomas Kodadek

Funding

Discovery and Treatment of the Early Autoimmune Reaction In Type 1 DiabetesDP3DK094309 · NIDDK · SCRIPPS FLORIDA · PI KODADEK, THOMAS J. · 2011 to 2011
$5.0M
NHLBI NIH HHS N01-HV-00242NIDDK NIH HHS DP3 DK094309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Large one-bead one-compound (OBOC) combinatorial libraries can be constructed relatively easily by solid-phase split and pool synthesis. The use of resins with hydrophilic surfaces, such as TentaGel, allows the beads to be used directly in screens for compounds that bind selectively to labeled proteins, nucleic acids, or other biomolecules. However, we have found that this method, while useful, has a high false positive rate. In other words, beads that are scored as hits often display compounds that prove to be poor ligands for the target of interest when they are resynthesized and carried through validation trials. This results in a significant waste of time and resources in cases where putative hits cannot be validated without resynthesis. Here, we report that this problem can be largely eliminated through the use of redundant OBOC libraries, where more than one bead displaying the same compound is present in the screen. We show that compounds isolated more than once are likely to be high quality ligands for the target of interest, whereas compounds isolated only once have a much higher likelihood of being poor ligands. While the use of redundant libraries does limit the number of unique compounds that can be screened at one time in this format, the overall savings in time, effort, and materials makes this a more efficient route to the isolation of useful ligands for biomolecules.

Indexed as

Combinatorial Chemistry TechniquesAntibodiesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalLigandsMolecular StructureParticle SizePeptide LibraryPolystyrenesProtein BindingSurface PropertiesAntibodiesLigandsPeptide LibraryPolystyrenesTentagel resin

Identifiers

PMID24749624
PMCPMC4053090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.