Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24749405›Full record

ArticleJournal of biomedical nanotechnology2014

Design of nanodrugs for miRNA targeting in tumor cells.

Byunghee Yoo, Subrata K Ghosh, Mohanraja Kumar, Anna Moore, Mehmet V Yigit, Zdravka Medarova

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of biomedical nanotechnology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Byunghee Yoo
Subrata K Ghosh
Mohanraja Kumar
Anna Moore
Mehmet V Yigit
Zdravka Medarova
Harvard University · USAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging · USMassachusetts General Hospital · USUniversity at Albany, State University of New York · US

Funding

MicroRNA Therapy for Lymph Node Metastatic Breast CancerR01CA163461 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MEDAROVA, ZDRAVKA O · 2012 to 2016
$1.9M
Target-Specific Imaging and Delivery of siRNA to TumorsR00CA129070 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MEDAROVA, ZDRAVKA O · 2009 to 2011
$739k
IVIS Spectrum Imaging SystemS10RR025504 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI MOORE, ANNA · 2009 to 2009
$341k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA163461-01A1NCI NIH HHS R00 CA129070NCI NIH HHS R00CA129070NCI NIH HHS R01 CA163461NCRR NIH HHS S10 RR025504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The delivery of oligonucleotide antagonists to cytosolic RNA targets such as microRNA represents an avenue for the post-transcriptional control of cellular phenotype. In tumor cells, oncogenic miRNAs, termed oncomirs, are tightly linked to processes that ultimately determine cancer initiation, progression, and response to therapy. Therefore, the capacity to redirect tumor cell fate towards therapeutically beneficial phenotypes holds promise in a future clinical scenario. Previously, we have designed "nanodrugs" for the specific inhibition of oncogenic microRNAs in tumor cells. The basic design of these nanodrugs includes dextran coated iron oxide nanoparticles, conjugated to a tumor-targeting peptide, and a locked nucleic acid (LNA)-modified antisense oligonucleotide that stably binds and inhibits the complementary mature miRNA. Here, we focus on elucidating an optimal nanodrug design for effective miRNA inhibition in tumor cells. Specifically, we investigate the choice of chemical linker for the conjugation of the oligonucleotide to the nanoparticles and evaluate the contribution of tumor-cell targeting to nanodrug uptake and functionality. We find that short labile linkers (SPDP; N-Succinimidyl 3-(2-pyridyldithio)-propionate) are superior to non-labile short linkers (GMBS; N-(gamma-Maleimidobutyryloxy)succinimide ester) or non-labile long linkers (PEG24; Succinimidyl-([N-maleimidopropionamido]-24ethyleneglycol)ester) in terms of their capacity to gain access to the cytosolic cellular compartment and to engage their cognate miRNA. Furthermore, using the nanodrug design that incorporates SPDP as a linker, we establish that the addition of tumor-cell targeting through functionalization of the nanodrug with the alphavbeta3-specific cyclic RGDfK-PEG peptide does not confer an advantage in vitro at long incubation times required for inhibition.

Indexed as

Cell Line, TumorDrug DesignGenetic TherapyHumansMicroRNAsMolecular Targeted TherapyNanocapsulesNeoplasms, ExperimentalParticle SizeMicroRNAsNanocapsules

Identifiers

PMID24749405
PMCPMC4174340
OpenAlexW1991287269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.