Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24749066›Full record

ArticleStem cell reports2014

Do neonatal mouse hearts regenerate following heart apex resection?

Ditte Caroline Andersen, Suganya Ganesalingam, Charlotte Harken Jensen, Søren Paludan Sheikh

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Stem cell reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
73citing papers in PubMed
9.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

73 citing papers in PubMed, 109 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The role of periostin in cardiac fibrosis.Heart failure reviews · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The regenerative capacity of neonatal tissues.Development (Cambridge, England) · 2022
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Cauterization as a Simple Method for Regeneration Studies in the Zebrafish Heart.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Model organisms at the heart of regeneration.Disease models & mechanisms · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Adult Cardiomyocyte Cell Cycle Detour: Off-ramp to Quiescent Destinations.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2019
    Review

13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ditte Caroline AndersenLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Winsloewparken 21 , 5000 Odense C, Denmark ; Clinical Institute, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Suganya GanesalingamLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Winsloewparken 21 , 5000 Odense C, Denmark ; Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Charlotte Harken JensenLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Winsloewparken 21 , 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
Søren Paludan SheikhLaboratory of Molecular and Cellular Cardiology, Department of Clinical Biochemistry and Pharmacology, Odense University Hospital, Winsloewparken 21 , 5000 Odense C, Denmark ; Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Southern Denmark, 5000 Odense C, Denmark.
University of Southern Denmark · DKOdense University Hospital · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mammalian heart has generally been considered nonregenerative, but recent progress suggests that neonatal mouse hearts have a genuine capacity to regenerate following apex resection (AR). However, in this study, we performed AR or sham surgery on 400 neonatal mice from inbred and outbred strains and found no evidence of complete regeneration. Ideally, new functional cardiomyocytes, endothelial cells, and vascular smooth muscle cells should be formed in the necrotic area of the damaged heart. Here, damaged hearts were 9.8% shorter and weighed 14% less than sham controls. In addition, the resection border contained a massive fibrotic scar mainly composed of nonmyocytes and collagen disposition. Furthermore, there was a substantial reduction in the number of proliferating cardiomyocytes in AR hearts. Our results thus question the usefulness of the AR model for identifying molecular mechanisms underlying regeneration of the adult heart after damage.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, NewbornCardiac Surgical ProceduresCell ProliferationHeartMiceMice, Inbred C57BLModels, AnimalMyocardiumMyocytes, CardiacNeovascularization, PhysiologicRegenerationWound Healing

Identifiers

PMID24749066
PMCPMC3986579
OpenAlexW1974793820

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.