Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24748800›Full record

ReviewVascular health and risk management2014

Current guidelines for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in therapy and future directions.

Bishnu H Subedi, Parag H Joshi, Steven R Jones, Seth S Martin, Michael J Blaha, Erin D Michos

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Vascular health and risk management, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. OpenFDA: an innovative platform providing access to a wealth of FDA's publicly available data.Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA · 2016
    Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bishnu H SubediJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA ; Greater Baltimore Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Parag H JoshiJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Steven R JonesJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Seth S MartinJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Michael J BlahaJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Erin D MichosJohns Hopkins Ciccarone Center for the Prevention of Heart Disease, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USJohns Hopkins Medicine · USGreater Baltimore Medical Center · US

Funding

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY OF MYOCARDIAL DISEASEST32HL007227 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Chulan Kwon, WENDY S POST · 1985 to 2026
$21.2M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many studies have suggested that a significant risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) is low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C). Therefore, increasing HDL-C with therapeutic agents has been considered an attractive strategy. In the prestatin era, fibrates and niacin monotherapy, which cause modest increases in HDL-C, reduced ASCVD events. Since their introduction, statins have become the cornerstone of lipoprotein therapy, the benefits of which are primarily attributed to decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol. Findings from several randomized trials involving niacin or cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors have challenged the concept that a quantitative elevation of plasma HDL-C will uniformly translate into ASCVD benefits. Consequently, the HDL, or more correctly, HDL-C hypothesis has become more controversial. There are no clear guidelines thus far for targeting HDL-C or HDL due to lack of solid outcomes data for HDL specific therapies. HDL-C levels are only one marker of HDL out of its several structural or functional properties. Novel approaches are ongoing in developing and assessing agents that closely mimic the structure of natural HDL or replicate its various functions, for example, reverse cholesterol transport, vasodilation, anti-inflammation, or inhibition of platelet aggregation. Potential new approaches like HDL infusions, delipidated HDL, liver X receptor agonists, Apo A-I upregulators, Apo A mimetics, and gene therapy are in early phase trials. This review will outline current therapies and describe future directions for HDL therapeutics.

Indexed as

Genetic TherapyPractice Guidelines as TopicBiomarkersCholesterol, HDLDyslipidemiasHumansHypolipidemic AgentsLipid MetabolismLipoproteins, HDLTreatment OutcomeBiomarkersCholesterol, HDLHypolipidemic AgentsLipoproteins, HDLatherosclerosiscardiovascular diseasecholesterolhigh-density lipoproteinlipidstherapy

Identifiers

PMID24748800
PMCPMC3986285
OpenAlexW2081468970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.