ArticleWorld journal of urology2015
CXCR4 is highly expressed at the tumor front but not in the center of prostate cancers.
Article in World journal of urology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The association of CXCR4 expression with clinicopathological significance and potential drug target in prostate cancer: a meta-analysis and literature review.Drug design, development and therapy · 2015Pooled it
- Transcriptome analysis reveals upregulation of immune response pathways at the invasive tumour front of metastatic seminoma germ cell tumours.British journal of cancer · 2022Article
- Evaluation of Somatostatin and CXCR4 Receptor Expression in a Large Set of Prostate Cancer Samples Using Tissue Microarrays and Well-Characterized Monoclonal Antibodies.Translational oncology · 2020Article
- miR-330 Regulates Colorectal Cancer Oncogenesis by Targeting BACH1.Advanced pharmaceutical bulletin · 2020Article
- Augmented migration of mesenchymal stem cells correlates with the subsidiary CXCR4 variant.Cell adhesion & migration · 2018Article
- CXCL12 promoter methylation and PD-L1 expression as prognostic biomarkers in prostate cancer patients.Oncotarget · 2016Article
- High RhoA expression at the tumor front in clinically localized prostate cancer and association with poor tumor differentiation.Oncology letters · 2016Article
- Tumor talk: understanding the conversation between the tumor and its microenvironment.Cancer cell & microenvironment · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the expression of CXCR4, its ligand SDF-1, β-catenin and E-cadherin throughout the local tumor microenvironment of prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND
methodsA total of 64 prostate cancer specimens, 24 frozen and 40 paraffin-embedded sections, were obtained from patients treated with radical prostatectomy for clinically localized cancer. Real-time RT-PCR was used for mRNA quantification of CXCR4 and SDF-1 in the tumor center (T), tumor front (F) and distant peritumoral tissue (D). Immunohistochemical analysis was used to investigate the expression patterns of CXCR4, E-cadherin and β-catenin. Clinical records of these patients were studied for follow-up data, and the prognostic value of these molecules' expression was statistically assessed.
resultsCXCR4 mRNA and protein were significantly increased at the tumor front as compared to distant tissue or tumor center. In comparison, SDF-1 mRNA level gradually increased from the tumor center to the distant peritumoral tissue. High CXCR4 at the tumor front was associated with high Gleason score. Low SDF-1 at the tumor front was associated with locally advanced cancer and disease recurrence. Moreover, high CXCR4 staining at the tumor front and increased cytosolic E-cadherin expression in the same location was associated with locally advanced disease.
conclusionsCXCR4 seems overexpressed at the tumor front of prostate tumors, where it potentially promotes cell migration toward the SDF-1 centrifugal attracting gradient, as well as epithelial-mesenchymal transition. High CXCR4 and low SDF-1 levels at tumor front were both associated with adverse histological features.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24748552What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.