ArticleArchives of toxicology2014
Protocols for staining of bile canalicular and sinusoidal networks of human, mouse and pig livers, three-dimensional reconstruction and quantification of tissue microarchitecture by image processing and analysis.
Article in Archives of toxicology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
52 citing papers in PubMed, 139 citations in OpenAlex.
- 3D reconstruction of human liver tissue at cellular resolution.Science advances · 2026Article
- A Feasibility Study on 3-D Imaging of Intrahepatic Bile Ducts in Patients with Biliary Atresia Using Airy Beam Excited Two-Photon Microscopy.Applied biochemistry and biotechnology · 2025Article
- Optimized immunofluorescence for liver structure analysis: Enhancing 3D resolution and minimizing tissue autofluorescence.Biology methods & protocols · 2025Review
- Spatial proteomics of single cells and organelles on tissue slides using filter-aided expansion proteomics.Nature communications · 2024Article
- In Vivo Tracking and 3D Mapping of Cell Death in Regeneration and Cancer Using Trypan Blue.Cells · 2024Article
- Phenotypic characterization of liver tissue heterogeneity through a next-generation 3D single-cell atlas.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Article
- Digital twin demonstrates significance of biomechanical growth control in liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy.iScience · 2023Article
- Microneedle array facilitates hepatic sinusoid construction in a large-scale liver-acinus-chip microsystem.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2023Article
- Bioengineering liver microtissues for modeling non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.EXCLI journal · 2023Review
- Article
- Role of the Hippo pathway in liver regeneration and repair: recent advances.Inflammation and regeneration · 2022Review
- Guided interactive image segmentation using machine learning and color-based image set clustering.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2022Article
- From Seeing to Simulating: A Survey of Imaging Techniques and Spatially-Resolved Data for Developing Multiscale Computational Models of Liver Regeneration.Frontiers in systems biology · 2022Article
- Monomeric/dimeric forms of Fgf15/FGF19 show differential activity in hepatocyte proliferation and metabolic function.FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology · 2021Article
- A quantitative high-resolution computational mechanics cell model for growing and regenerating tissues.Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology · 2020Article
- Highlight report: New insights in liver physiology: Canalicular bile flux is diffusion dominated.EXCLI journal · 2020Article
- Highlight Report: Hepatobiliary differentiation from human induced pluripotent stem cells.EXCLI journal · 2020Article
- Tubular bile duct structure mimicking bile duct morphogenesis for prospective in vitro liver metabolite recovery.Journal of biological engineering · 2020Article
- Bile Microinfarcts in Cholestasis Are Initiated by Rupture of the Apical Hepatocyte Membrane and Cause Shunting of Bile to Sinusoidal Blood.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Histological alterations often constitute a fingerprint of toxicity and diseases. The extent to which these alterations are cause or consequence of compromised organ function, and the underlying mechanisms involved is a matter of intensive research. In particular, liver disease is often associated with altered tissue microarchitecture, which in turn may compromise perfusion and functionality. Research in this field requires the development and orchestration of new techniques into standardized processing pipelines that can be used to reproducibly quantify tissue architecture. Major bottlenecks include the lack of robust staining, and adequate reconstruction and quantification techniques. To bridge this gap, we established protocols employing specific antibody combinations for immunostaining, confocal imaging, three-dimensional reconstruction of approximately 100-μm-thick tissue blocks and quantification of key architectural features. We describe a standard procedure termed 'liver architectural staining' for the simultaneous visualization of bile canaliculi, sinusoidal endothelial cells, glutamine synthetase (GS) for the identification of central veins, and DAPI as a nuclear marker. Additionally, we present a second standard procedure entitled 'S-phase staining', where S-phase-positive and S-phase-negative nuclei (stained with BrdU and DAPI, respectively), sinusoidal endothelial cells and GS are stained. The techniques include three-dimensional reconstruction of the sinusoidal and bile canalicular networks from the same tissue block, and robust capture of position, size and shape of individual hepatocytes, as well as entire lobules from the same tissue specimen. In addition to the protocols, we have also established image analysis software that allows relational and hierarchical quantifications of different liver substructures (e.g. cells and vascular branches) and events (e.g. cell proliferation and death). Typical results acquired for routinely quantified parameters in adult mice (C57Bl6/N) include the hepatocyte volume (5,128.3 ± 837.8 μm(3)) and the fraction of the hepatocyte surface in contact with the neighbouring hepatocytes (67.4 ± 6.7 %), sinusoids (22.1 ± 4.8 %) and bile canaliculi (9.9 ± 3.8 %). Parameters of the sinusoidal network that we also routinely quantify include the radius of the sinusoids (4.8 ± 2.25 μm), the branching angle (32.5 ± 11.2°), the length of intersection branches (23.93 ± 5.9 μm), the number of intersection nodes per mm(3) (120.3 × 103 ± 42.1 × 10(3)), the average length of sinusoidal vessel per mm(3) (5.4 × 10(3) ± 1.4 × 10(3)mm) and the percentage of vessel volume in relation to the whole liver volume (15.3 ± 3.9) (mean ± standard deviation). Moreover, the provided parameters of the bile canalicular network are: length of the first-order branches (7.5 ± 0.6 μm), length of the second-order branches (10.9 ± 1.8 μm), length of the dead-end branches (5.9 ± 0.7 μm), the number of intersection nodes per mm(3) (819.1 × 10(3) ± 180.7 × 10(3)), the number of dead-end branches per mm(3) (409.9 × 10(3) ± 95.6 × 10(3)), the length of the bile canalicular network per mm(3) (9.4 × 10(3) ± 0.7 × 10(3) mm) and the percentage of the bile canalicular volume with respect to the total liver volume (3.4 ± 0.005). A particular strength of our technique is that quantitative parameters of hepatocytes and bile canalicular as well as sinusoidal networks can be extracted from the same tissue block. Reconstructions and quantifications performed as described in the current protocols can be used for quantitative mathematical modelling of the underlying mechanisms. Furthermore, protocols are presented for both human and pig livers. The technique is also applicable for both vibratome blocks and conventional paraffin slices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.