Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24748335›Full record

ArticleInvestigational new drugs2014

Gemcitabine and oxaliplatin chemotherapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma after failure of anti-angiogenic therapies.

Anna Patrikidou, Isabelle Sinapi, Hélène Regnault, Florence Fayard, Mohamed Bouattour, Laetitia Fartoux, Sandrine Faivre, David Malka, Michel Ducreux, Valerie Boige

Abstract readMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Investigational new drugs, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Guideline
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Anna PatrikidouDepartment of Oncologic Medicine, Gustave-Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Isabelle Sinapi
Hélène Regnault
Florence Fayard
Mohamed Bouattour
Laetitia Fartoux
Sandrine Faivre
David Malka
Michel Ducreux
Valerie Boige
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRHôpital Beaujon · FRHôpital Saint-Antoine · FRSorbonne Université · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSorafenib is the only systemic treatment that has shown a significant benefit in overall survival (OS) and in progression-free survival (PFS) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. No standard of care currently exists for second-line treatment. The association of Gemcitabine-Oxaliplatine (GEMOX) has shown efficacy in the first-line setting. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of GEMOX after failure of at least one line of anti-angiogenic (AA) therapy. PATIENT AND

methodsWe performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of advanced HCC patients that received GEMOX chemotherapy after progression on at least one line of AA therapy.

resultsWe analyzed a total of 40 patients that received a median of 7 cycles of GEMOX over a 6-year period. Grade 3/4 toxicity was observed in 25 % of patients, mainly neurotoxicity, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia in 12.5 %, 5 % and 5 % of patients respectively. Grade <3 toxicity was mainly hematological and neurotoxicity. In the sub-cohort of 35 patients evaluable for response, partial response was observed in 20 % of patients, while 46 % had stable disease. Median OS was 8.3 months, with a 6-month OS rate of 59 %. Median PFS was 3.1 months. Prognostic factors for OS in univariable analysis were the performance status and AFP levels at GEMOX start, and the BCLC score at diagnosis. None of these factors were prognostic for PFS or tumor response.

conclusionThe GEMOX schedule seems to show clinical activity and an acceptable toxicity profile in advanced HCC patients who progressed after anti-angiogenic treatment. The observed median OS of over 8 months is encouraging in this population of heavily pretreated patients. These results would merit confirmation in a prospective randomized study.

Indexed as

Angiogenesis InhibitorsAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsCarcinoma, HepatocellularDeoxycytidineDisease-Free SurvivalDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedOrganoplatinum CompoundsTomography, X-Ray ComputedTreatment OutcomeAngiogenesis InhibitorsDeoxycytidineOrganoplatinum Compounds

Identifiers

PMID24748335
OpenAlexW2011234471

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.