Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24748147›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Shotgun pyrosequencing metagenomic analyses of dusts from swine confinement and grain facilities.

Robert J Boissy, Debra J Romberger, William A Roughead, Lisa Weissenburger-Moser, Jill A Poole, Tricia D LeVan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 50 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
50citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

50 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Resistome in the indoor dust samples from workplaces and households: a pilot study.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Respiratory exposure to agricultural dust extract promotes increased intestinalAmerican journal of physiology. Gastrointestinal and liver physiology · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Organic Dust Exposure Enhances SARS-CoV-2 Entry in a PKCInternational journal of translational medicine (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Effects of elevated CORespiratory research · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Robert J BoissyUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Pathology and Microbiology, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Debra J RombergerVeterans Nebraska Western Iowa Healthcare System, Omaha, NE, USA and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine & Allergy Division, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
William A RougheadUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine & Allergy Division, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Lisa Weissenburger-MoserUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine & Allergy Division, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Jill A PooleUniversity of Nebraska Medical Center, Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine & Allergy Division, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Tricia D LeVanVeterans Nebraska Western Iowa Healthcare System, Omaha, NE, USA and University of Nebraska Medical Center, Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine & Allergy Division, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep Medicine & Allergy Division, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America; University of Nebraska Medical Center, Department of Epidemiology, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
University of Nebraska Medical Center · US

Funding

Surveillance of Agricultural Injuries in the Central States RegionsU54OH010162 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI RAUTIAINEN, RISTO HEIKKI · 2011 to 2025
$23.6M
Role of pattern recognition receptors in organic dust-induced airway inflammationR01ES019325 · NIEHS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI POOLE, JILL A · 2010 to 2020
$3.7M
Targeting Airway Inflammation from Concentrated Animal Feeding Operation DustR01OH008539 · OH · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI ROMBERGER, DEBRA J · 2006 to 2014
$3.7M
ACL HHS U54OH010162CSRD VA I01 CX000434NIEHS NIH HHS ES019325NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES019325NIOSH CDC HHS 1U54OH010162-01NIOSH CDC HHS 2R01OH008539NIOSH CDC HHS R01 OH008539NIOSH CDC HHS U54 OH010162
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inhalation of agricultural dusts causes inflammatory reactions and symptoms such as headache, fever, and malaise, which can progress to chronic airway inflammation and associated diseases, e.g. asthma, chronic bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and hypersensitivity pneumonitis. Although in many agricultural environments feed particles are the major constituent of these dusts, the inflammatory responses that they provoke are likely attributable to particle-associated bacteria, archaebacteria, fungi, and viruses. In this study, we performed shotgun pyrosequencing metagenomic analyses of DNA from dusts from swine confinement facilities or grain elevators, with comparisons to dusts from pet-free households. DNA sequence alignment showed that 19% or 62% of shotgun pyrosequencing metagenomic DNA sequence reads from swine facility or household dusts, respectively, were of swine or human origin, respectively. In contrast only 2% of such reads from grain elevator dust were of mammalian origin. These metagenomic shotgun reads of mammalian origin were excluded from our analyses of agricultural dust microbiota. The ten most prevalent bacterial taxa identified in swine facility compared to grain elevator or household dust were comprised of 75%, 16%, and 42% gram-positive organisms, respectively. Four of the top five swine facility dust genera were assignable (Clostridium, Lactobacillus, Ruminococcus, and Eubacterium, ranging from 4% to 19% relative abundance). The relative abundances of these four genera were lower in dust from grain elevators or pet-free households. These analyses also highlighted the predominance in swine facility dust of Firmicutes (70%) at the phylum level, Clostridia (44%) at the Class level, and Clostridiales at the Order level (41%). In summary, shotgun pyrosequencing metagenomic analyses of agricultural dusts show that they differ qualitatively and quantitatively at the level of microbial taxa present, and that the bioinformatic analyses used for such studies must be carefully designed to avoid the potential contribution of non-microbial DNA, e.g. from resident mammals.

Indexed as

AgricultureEnvironmental MicrobiologyMetagenomicsMicrobiotaAnimalsBacteriaBiomarkersDatasets as TopicDustEdible GrainGenomeHumansPhylogenyRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSequence Analysis, DNASwineBiomarkersDustRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID24748147
PMCPMC3991671
OpenAlexW2045283623

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.