Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24748031›Full record

ArticleOptometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry2014

Differences in neuroretinal function between adult males and females.

Glen Y Ozawa, Marcus A Bearse, Wendy W Harrison, Kevin W Bronson-Castain, Marilyn E Schneck, Shirin Barez, Anthony J Adams

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sex Hormones and Optic Nerve Disorders: A Review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2019
    Review
  11. Gonadal Hormones and Retinal Disorders: A Review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2018
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Glen Y Ozawa*OD †PhD ‡OD, PhD, FAAO §PhD, RN ∥MD University of California, Berkeley School of Optometry, Berkeley, California (GO, MAB, KWB-C, MES, SB, AJA); and Midwestern University, Arizona College of Optometry, Glendale, Arizona (WWH).
Marcus A Bearse
Wendy W Harrison
Kevin W Bronson-Castain
Marilyn E Schneck
Shirin Barez
Anthony J Adams
Fundação Armando Alvares Penteado · BRUniversity of California, Berkeley · US

Funding

VISION CHANGES IN DIABETICSR01EY002271 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI ADAMS, ANTHONY J · 1985 to 2010
$3.6M
Predicting diabetic macular edema using functional measuresR01EY021811 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY · PI SCHNECK, MARILYN EVE · 2011 to 2015
$1.8M
NEI NIH HHS EY021811NEI NIH HHS EY02271NEI NIH HHS R01 EY002271NEI NIH HHS R01 EY021811
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine whether neuroretinal function differs in healthy adult males and females younger and older than 50 years.

methodsThis study included one eye from each of 50 normal subjects (29 females and 21 males). Neuroretinal function was assessed using first-order P1 implicit times (ITs) and N1-P1 amplitudes (AMPs) obtained from photopic multifocal electroretinograms. To assess local differences, retinal maps of local IT and (separately) AMP averages were constructed for each subject group. To examine global differences, each subject's 103 ITs and (separately) AMPs were also averaged to create whole-eye averages. Subsequently, retinal maps and whole-eye averages of one subject group were compared with those of another.

resultsIn subjects younger than 50 years, neuroretinal function differed significantly between the males and females: local ITs were significantly shorter at 83 of 103 tested retinal locations, and whole-eye IT averages were shorter (p = 0.015) in the males compared with the females. In contrast, no analysis indicated that the males and females older than 50 years were significantly different. A subanalysis showed that the females who reported a hysterectomy (n = 5) had the longest whole-eye ITs of all subject groups (p ≤ 0.0013). In the females who did not report a hysterectomy, neuroretinal function was worse in the females older than 50 years compared with the females younger than 50 years: local ITs were significantly longer at 62 of 103 retinal locations tested, and whole-eye IT averages tended to be greater (p = 0.04). Conversely, ITs were not statistically different between the younger and older males. N1-P1 amplitudes did not differ between the sexes.

conclusionsMultifocal electroretinogram IT differs between males and females, depending on the age group and hysterectomy status.

Indexed as

ElectroretinographyAdultAge FactorsElectrophysiologyFemaleHumansHysterectomyMaleMiddle AgedPhotic StimulationRetinaSex Factors

Identifiers

PMID24748031
PMCPMC4104186
OpenAlexW2321352819

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.