Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24747973›Full record

ArticleOncogene2015

Orthotopic models of pediatric brain tumors in zebrafish.

C J Eden, B Ju, M Murugesan, T N Phoenix, B Nimmervoll, Y Tong, D W Ellison, D Finkelstein, K Wright, N Boulos and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Zebrafish live imaging: a strong weapon in anticancer drug discovery and development.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2024
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. One Host-Multiple Applications: Zebrafish (International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Zebrafish Models of Paediatric Brain Tumours.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  16. Benefits of Zebrafish Xenograft Models in Cancer Research.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C J EdenDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
B JuDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
M MurugesanDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
T N PhoenixDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
B NimmervollDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Y TongDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
D W EllisonDepartment of Pathology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
D FinkelsteinDepartment of Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
K WrightDepartment of Oncology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
N BoulosDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
J DapperDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
R ThiruvenkatamDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
C A LessmanDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN, USA.
M R TaylorDepartment of Chemical Biology and Therapeutics, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
R J GilbertsonDepartment of Developmental Neurobiology, St Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
St. Jude Children's Research Hospital · USUniversity of Memphis · US

Funding

Viral Vector Technology (VVTSR)P30CA021765 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI CHARLES ROBERTS · 1985 to 2026
$166.9M
The DNA Damage Response and Tumorigenesis in the BrainP01CA096832 · NCI · ST. JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL · PI BAKER, SUZANNE J. · 2003 to 2025
$38.0M
An Investigation of Radial Glia as the Source of Ependymoma Stem CellsR01CA129541 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE · PI GILBERTSON, RICHARD · 2007 to 2016
$3.0M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA096832NCI NIH HHS P01CA96832NCI NIH HHS P30 CA021765NCI NIH HHS P30CA021765,NCI NIH HHS R01 CA129541NCI NIH HHS R01CA129541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput screens (HTS) of compound toxicity against cancer cells can identify thousands of potential new drug-leads. But only limited numbers of these compounds can progress to expensive and labor-intensive efficacy studies in mice, creating a 'bottle neck' in the drug development pipeline. Approaches that triage drug-leads for further study are greatly needed. Here we provide an intermediary platform between HTS and mice by adapting mouse models of pediatric brain tumors to grow as orthotopic xenografts in the brains of zebrafish. Freshly isolated mouse ependymoma, glioma and choroid plexus carcinoma cells expressing red fluorescence protein were conditioned to grow at 34 °C. Conditioned tumor cells were then transplanted orthotopically into the brains of zebrafish acclimatized to ambient temperatures of 34 °C. Live in vivo fluorescence imaging identified robust, quantifiable and reproducible brain tumor growth as well as spinal metastasis in zebrafish. All tumor xenografts in zebrafish retained the histological characteristics of the corresponding parent mouse tumor and efficiently recruited fish endothelial cells to form a tumor vasculature. Finally, by treating zebrafish harboring ERBB2-driven gliomas with an appropriate cytotoxic chemotherapy (5-fluorouracil) or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (erlotinib), we show that these models can effectively assess drug efficacy. Our data demonstrate, for the first time, that mouse brain tumors can grow orthotopically in fish and serve as a platform to study drug efficacy. As large cohorts of brain tumor-bearing zebrafish can be generated rapidly and inexpensively, these models may serve as a powerful tool to triage drug-leads from HTS for formal efficacy testing in mice.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBrain NeoplasmsChildDrug DiscoveryGliomaHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysHumansMiceNeoplasm TransplantationTranscriptomeTransplantation, HeterologousZebrafish

Identifiers

PMID24747973
PMCPMC4205223
OpenAlexW2167240068

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.