Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24747966›Full record

ArticleOncogene2015

Glioma-specific Domain IV EGFR cysteine mutations promote ligand-induced covalent receptor dimerization and display enhanced sensitivity to dacomitinib in vivo.

S A Greenall, J F Donoghue, N G Gottardo, T G Johns, T E Adams

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Oncogene, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. EGFR: New Insights on Its Activation and Mutation in Tumor and Tumor Immunotherapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. CyclicOncotarget · 2018
    Article
  11. Molecular Correlates ofBladder cancer (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Investigational new drugs for brain cancer.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2016
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Transcriptomic analysis ofNeuro-oncology advances
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

S A Greenall160;CSIRO Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
J F DonoghueOncogenic Signaling Laboratory and Brain Cancer Discovery Collaborative, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
N G GottardoTelethon Institute for Child Health Research and Brain Cancer Discovery Collaborative, Centre for Child Health Research, Subiaco, WA, Australia.
T G JohnsOncogenic Signaling Laboratory and Brain Cancer Discovery Collaborative, Monash Institute of Medical Research, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
T E Adams160;CSIRO Division of Materials Science and Engineering, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Monash Institute of Medical Research · AUThe Kids Research Institute Australia · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A feature of many gliomas is the amplification of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), resulting in its overexpression. Missense mutations or deletions within the extracellular domain are associated with this amplification and can lead to constitutive activation of the receptor, with the Domain I/II deletion, EGFRvIII, being the most common. These changes have also been associated with increased sensitivity to EGFR inhibition using small molecule inhibitors. We have expressed, in human glioma cells, EGFR containing four glioma-specific EGFR missense mutations within Domain IV (C620Y, C624F, C628Y and C636Y) to analyze their biological properties and sensitivity to EGFR inhibition. One of these mutants, C620Y, exhibited an enhanced basal phosphorylation, which was partially dependent on an EGFR-ligand autocrine loop. All Domain IV mutants responded equally as well as wildtype EGFR (wtEGFR) to ligand stimulation. Biochemical analysis revealed that a pre-formed, disulfide-bonded dimer associated with these mutations was underglycosylated, inactive and cytoplasmically retained. Ligand stimulation resulted in the formation of a tyrosine-phosphorylated, disulfide-bonded dimer for all Domain IV mutants but not for wtEGFR. Following treatment with the next-generation, irreversible pan-ErbB inhibitor dacomitinib, the C620Y, C624F and EGFRvIII mutants were inactivated, covalently dimerized and were retained in the cytoplasm, resulting in cell-surface receptor loss and, for C620Y and C624F, decreased binding of EGF. Dacomitinib treatment significantly reduced the in vivo growth of human glioma xenografts bearing C620Y, but not wtEGFR. Collectively, these data indicate that the unique biochemical traits of Domain IV EGFR cysteine mutants can be exploited for enhanced sensitivity to EGFR small molecule inhibitors, with potential clinical applications.

Indexed as

MutationProtein MultimerizationAnimalsCell Line, TumorCysteineErbB ReceptorsFemaleGliomaHumansLigandsMiceMice, Inbred BALB CPhosphorylationProtein Structure, TertiaryQuinazolinonesCysteinedacomitinibEGFR protein, mouseepidermal growth factor receptor VIIIErbB ReceptorsLigandsQuinazolinones

Identifiers

PMID24747966
OpenAlexW2092640706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.