Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24747816›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

The role of 1.5 tesla MRI and anesthetic regimen concerning cardiac analysis in mice with cardiomyopathy.

Ulrich Grabmaier, Hans D Theiss, Alexandra Keithahn, Julia Kreiner, Christoph Brenner, Bruno Huber, Christine von der Helm, Lisa Gross, Karin Klingel, Wolfgang-M Franz and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Mouse Cardiovascular Imaging.Current protocols · 2024
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Ulrich GrabmaierDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Hans D TheissDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Alexandra KeithahnDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.
Julia KreinerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Christoph BrennerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Bruno HuberDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Christine von der HelmDepartment of Dermatology, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
Lisa GrossDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Karin KlingelDepartment of Molecular Pathology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Wolfgang-M FranzDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.
Stefan BrunnerDepartment of Internal Medicine I, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Campus Grosshadern, Munich, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate assessment of left ventricular function in rodent models is essential for the evaluation of new therapeutic approaches for cardiac diseases. In our study, we provide new insights regarding the role of a 1.5 Tesla (T) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) device and different anesthetic regimens on data validity. As dedicated small animal MRI and echocardiographic devices are not broadly available, we evaluated whether monitoring cardiac function in small rodents with a clinical 1.5 T MRI device is feasible. On a clinical electrocardiogram (ECG) synchronized 1.5 T MRI scanner we therefore studied cardiac function parameters of mice with chronic virus-induced cardiomyopathy. Thus, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) could be verified compared to healthy controls. However, our results showed a high variability. First, anesthesia with medetomidine, midazolam and fentanyl (MMF) led to depressed cardiac function parameters and more variability than isoflurane gas inhalation anesthesia, especially at high concentrations. Furthermore, calculation of an average ejection fraction value from sequenced scans significantly reduced the variance of the results. To sum up, we introduce the clinical 1.5 T MRI device as a new tool for effective analysis of left ventricular function in mice with cardiomyopathy. Besides, we suggest isoflurane gas inhalation anesthesia at high concentrations for variance reduction and recommend calculation of an average ejection fraction value from multiple sequenced MRI scans to provide valid data and a solid basis for further clinical testing.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAnestheticsAnimalsCardiomyopathiesDose-Response Relationship, DrugHeartHeart Function TestsMaleMiceStroke VolumeAnesthetics

Identifiers

PMID24747816
PMCPMC3991627

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.