Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24747363›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in pharmacology2014

Are we taking full advantage of the growing number of pharmacological treatment options for osteoporosis?

Karl J Jepsen, Stephen H Schlecht, Kenneth M Kozloff

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in pharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Karl J JepsenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Michigan, Biomedical Science Research Building, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA. Electronic address: kjepsen@umich.edu.
Stephen H SchlechtDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Michigan, Biomedical Science Research Building, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
Kenneth M KozloffDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Michigan, Biomedical Science Research Building, 109 Zina Pitcher Place, Ann Arbor, MI 48109, USA.
University of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

GENETIC DETERMINATION OF SKELETAL FRAGILITYR01AR044927 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI JEPSEN, KARL J · 2002 to 2014
$4.3M
Sclerostin Antibody Therapy for Treatment of Osteogenesis ImperfectaR01AR062522 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI KOZLOFF, KENNETH M · 2012 to 2016
$1.8M
Genetic Determination of Skeletal FragilityR56AR044927 · NIAMS · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI JEPSEN, KARL J · 2009 to 2009
$500k
GENETIC DETERMINATION OF SKELETAL FRAGILITYR29AR044927 · NIAMS · MOUNT SINAI SCHOOL OF MEDICINE OF NYU · PI JEPSEN, KARL J · 1998 to 2002
$268k
NIAMS NIH HHS AR062522NIAMS NIH HHS AR44927NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR044927NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR062522NIAMS NIH HHS R29 AR044927NIAMS NIH HHS R56 AR044927
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We are becoming increasingly aware that the manner in which our skeleton ages is not uniform within and between populations. Pharmacological treatment options with the potential to combat age-related reductions in skeletal strength continue to become available on the market, notwithstanding our current inability to fully utilize these treatments by accounting for an individual's unique biomechanical needs. Revealing new molecular mechanisms that improve the targeted delivery of pharmaceuticals is important; however, this only addresses one part of the solution for differential age-related bone loss. To improve current treatment regimes, we must also consider specific biomechanical mechanisms that define how these molecular pathways ultimately impact whole bone fracture resistance. By improving our understanding of the relationship between molecular and biomechanical mechanisms, clinicians will be better equipped to take full advantage of the mounting pharmacological treatments available. Ultimately this will enable us to reduce fracture risk among the elderly more strategically, more effectively, and more economically. In this interest, the following review summarizes the biomechanical basis of current treatment strategies while defining how different biomechanical mechanisms lead to reduced fracture resistance. It is hoped that this may serve as a template for the identification of new targets for pharmacological treatments that will enable clinicians to personalize care so that fracture incidence may be globally reduced.

Indexed as

AgingFractures, BoneHumansOsteoporosis

Identifiers

PMID24747363
PMCPMC4072502
OpenAlexW2060868870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.