Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24747087›Full record

ReviewNeuroImage2014

A statistically motivated framework for simulation of stochastic data fusion models applied to multimodal neuroimaging.

Rogers F Silva, Sergey M Plis, Tülay Adalı, Vince D Calhoun

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in NeuroImage, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Multidataset Independent Subspace Analysis With Application to Multimodal Fusion.IEEE transactions on image processing : a publication of the IEEE Signal Processing Society · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Rogers F SilvaThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd., Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA; Department of ECE, MSC01 1100, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. Electronic address: rsilva@mrn.org.
Sergey M PlisThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd., Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA. Electronic address: splis@mrn.org.
Tülay AdalıDepartment of CSEE, University of Maryland Baltimore County, 1000 Hilltop Circle, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA. Electronic address: adali@umbc.edu.
Vince D CalhounThe Mind Research Network, 1101 Yale Blvd., Albuquerque, NM 87106, USA; Department of ECE, MSC01 1100, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA; Department of CS, MSC01 1130, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87131, USA. Electronic address: vcalhoun@unm.edu.
Mind Research Network · USUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore County · USUniversity of New Mexico · US

Funding

Multivariate methods for identifying multitask/multimodal brain imaging biomarkersR01EB006841 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI VINCE D CALHOUN, Sergey Plis · 2007 to 2026
$9.8M
Unified multivariate data-driven solutions for static and dynamic brain connectivityR01EB020407 · NIBIB · THE MIND RESEARCH NETWORK · PI ADALI, TULAY, CALHOUN, VINCE D · 2015 to 2018
$2.7M
NIBIB NIH HHS 1R01EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006841NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB020407
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multimodal fusion is becoming more common as it proves to be a powerful approach to identify complementary information from multimodal datasets. However, simulation of joint information is not straightforward. Published approaches mostly employ limited, provisional designs that often break the link between the model assumptions and the data for the sake of demonstrating properties of fusion techniques. This work introduces a new approach to synthetic data generation which allows full-compliance between data and model while still representing realistic spatiotemporal features in accordance with the current neuroimaging literature. The focus is on the simulation of joint information for the verification of stochastic linear models, particularly those used in multimodal data fusion of brain imaging data. Our first goal is to obtain a benchmark ground-truth in which estimation errors due to model mismatch are minimal or none. Then we move on to assess how estimation is affected by gradually increasing model discrepancies toward a more realistic dataset. The key aspect of our approach is that it permits complete control over the type and level of model mismatch, allowing for more educated inferences about the limitations and caveats of select stochastic linear models. As a result, impartial comparison of models is possible based on their performance in multiple different scenarios. Our proposed method uses the commonly overlooked theory of copulas to enable full control of the type and level of dependence/association between modalities, with no occurrence of spurious multimodal associations. Moreover, our approach allows for arbitrary single-modality marginal distributions for any fixed choice of dependence/association between multimodal features. Using our simulation framework, we can rigorously challenge the assumptions of several existing multimodal fusion approaches. Our study brings a new perspective to the problem of simulating multimodal data that can be used for ground-truth verification of various stochastic multimodal models available in the literature, and reveals some important aspects that are not captured or are overlooked by ad hoc simulations that lack a firm statistical motivation.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationModels, NeurologicalMultimodal ImagingNeuroimagingHumansStochastic ProcessesCopulaFusionICAMultidimensionalMultimodalSimulationStochastic

Identifiers

PMID24747087
PMCPMC7733398
OpenAlexW2065604017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.