Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24746835›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of nutritional biochemistry2014

Exposure to lard-based high-fat diet during fetal and lactation periods modifies breast cancer susceptibility in adulthood in rats.

Fábia de Oliveira Andrade, Camile Castilho Fontelles, Mariana Papaléo Rosim, Tiago Franco de Oliveira, Ana Paula de Melo Loureiro, Jorge Mancini-Filho, Marcelo Macedo Rogero, Fernando Salvador Moreno, Sonia de Assis, Luiz Fernando Barbisan and 2 more

Open access · greenAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of nutritional biochemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Effects of high-fat diets on fetal growth in rodents: a systematic review.Reproductive biology and endocrinology : RB&E · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Fábia de Oliveira AndradeFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Camile Castilho FontellesFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Mariana Papaléo RosimFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Tiago Franco de OliveiraFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Ana Paula de Melo LoureiroFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Jorge Mancini-FilhoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences.
Marcelo Macedo RogeroSchool of Public Health, University of São Paulo.
Fernando Salvador MorenoFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Food and Nutrition Research Center (NAPAN), São Paulo, Brazil.
Sonia de AssisGeorgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Luiz Fernando BarbisanState University of São Paulo, Botucatu, Brazil.
Leena Hilakivi-ClarkeGeorgetown University Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC, USA.
Thomas Prates OngFaculty of Pharmaceutical Sciences; Food and Nutrition Research Center (NAPAN), São Paulo, Brazil. Electronic address: tong@usp.br.
Pharmaceutical Biotechnology (Czechia) · CZGeorgetown University · USUniversidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BR

Funding

Transgenerational effects of maternal high fat diet during pregnancy on breast caR01CA164384 · NCI · GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY · PI HILAKIVI-CLARKE, LEENA A. · 2012 to 2015
$2.0M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA164384
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present study investigated whether early life exposure to high levels of animal fat increases breast cancer risk in adulthood in rats. Dams consumed a lard-based high-fat (HF) diet (60% fat-derived energy) or an AIN93G control diet (16% fat-derived energy) during gestation or gestation and lactation. Their 7-week-old female offspring were exposed to 7,12-dimethyl-benzo[a]anthracene to induce mammary tumors. Pregnant dams consuming an HF diet had higher circulating leptin levels than pregnant control dams. However, compared to the control offspring, significantly lower susceptibility to mammary cancer development was observed in the offspring of dams fed an HF diet during pregnancy (lower tumor incidence, multiplicity and weight), or pregnancy and lactation (lower tumor multiplicity only). Mammary epithelial elongation, cell proliferation (Ki67) and expression of NFκB p65 were significantly lower and p21 expression and global H3K9me3 levels were higher in the mammary glands of rats exposed to an HF lard diet in utero. They also tended to have lower Rank/Rankl ratios (P=.09) and serum progesterone levels (P=.07) than control offspring. In the mammary glands of offspring of dams consuming an HF diet during both pregnancy and lactation, the number of terminal end buds, epithelial elongation and the BCL-2/BAX ratio were significantly lower and serum leptin levels were higher than in the controls. Our data confirm that the breast cancer risk of offspring can be programmed by maternal dietary intake. However, contrary to our expectation, exposure to high levels of lard during early life decreased later susceptibility to breast cancer.

Indexed as

Fetal DevelopmentLactationMaternal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthraceneAnimalsBiomarkersBreast NeoplasmsDietary FatsDiet, High-FatDisease ResistanceFemaleGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalKaplan-Meier EstimateLeptinMammary Glands, AnimalPregnancy9,10-Dimethyl-1,2-benzanthraceneBiomarkersDietary FatslardLeptinProgesteroneBreast cancerFetal programmingH3K9me3High-fat dietRANK/RANKL pathway

Identifiers

PMID24746835
PMCPMC4501406
OpenAlexW2120164744

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.