ReviewTransplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.)2015
Genomics of liver transplant injury and regeneration.
Review in Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- Ischaemia reperfusion injury in liver transplantation: Cellular and molecular mechanisms.Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · 2019Review
- Graft protection of the liver by hypothermic machine perfusion involves recovery of graft regeneration in rats.The Journal of international medical research · 2019Article
- Investigate of AQP gene expression in the liver of mice after ischemia-reperfusion.Molecular biology reports · 2018Article
- Translational medical research and liver transplantation: systematic review.Translational gastroenterology and hepatology · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
While improved surgical techniques, post-operative care, and immunosuppression regimens have reduced morbidity and mortality associated with orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), further improvement of outcomes requires personalized treatment and a better understanding of genomic mechanisms involved. Gene expression profiles of ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury, regeneration, and rejection, may suggest mechanisms for development of better predictive tools and treatments. The liver is unique in its regenerative potential, recovering lost mass and function after injury from ischemia, resection, and rejection. I/R injury, an inevitable consequence of perfusion cessation, cold storage, and reperfusion, is regulated by the interaction of the immune system, inflammatory cytokines, and reduced microcirculatory blood flow in the liver. Rejection, a common post-operative complication, is mediated by the recipient's immune system through T-cell-dependent responses activating proinflammatory and apoptotic pathways. Characterizing distinctive gene expression signatures for these events can identify therapies to reduce injury, promote regeneration, and improve outcomes. While certain markers of liver injury and regeneration have been observed in animals, many of these are unverified in human studies. Further investigation of these genomic signatures and mechanisms through new technology offers promise, but continues to pose a significant challenge. An overview of the current fund of knowledge in this area is reviewed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.