Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24746582›Full record

ArticleRadiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology2014

Beam path toxicity in candidate organs-at-risk: assessment of radiation emetogenesis for patients receiving head and neck intensity modulated radiotherapy.

Esengul Kocak-Uzel, G Brandon Gunn, Rivka R Colen, Micheal E Kantor, Abdallah S R Mohamed, Sara Schoultz-Henley, Paniyotis Mavroidis, Steven J Frank, Adam S Garden, Beth M Beadle and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. 2016 updated MASCC/ESMO consensus recommendations: prevention of radiotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Radiation-induced rhinosinusitis: Mechanism research and clinical progress review.World journal of otorhinolaryngology - head and neck surgery · 2024
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Proton Therapy for Major Salivary Gland Cancer: Clinical Outcomes.International journal of particle therapy · 2021
    Article
  13. Dose-volume correlates of the prevalence of patient-reported trismus in long-term survivorship after oropharyngeal IMRT: A cross-sectional dosimetric analysis.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2020
    Article
  14. Fatigue following radiation therapy in nasopharyngeal cancer survivors: A dosimetric analysis incorporating patient report and observer rating.Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. The posterior cerebellum, a new organ at risk?Clinical and translational radiation oncology · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Esengul Kocak-UzelDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Radiation Oncology, Sisli Etfal Teaching and Research Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey.
G Brandon GunnDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Rivka R ColenDepartment of Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Micheal E KantorDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Abdallah S R MohamedDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; Department of Clinical Oncology, University of Alexandria, Egypt.
Sara Schoultz-HenleyUniversity of Texas Medical School at Houston, USA.
Paniyotis MavroidisDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, USA.
Steven J FrankDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, USA.
Adam S GardenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Beth M BeadleDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
William H MorrisonDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Jack PhanDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
David I RosenthalDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA.
Clifton D FullerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA; The University of Texas Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, USA. Electronic address: cdfuller@mdanderson.org.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Scott Kopetz · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Paul Calabresi Clinical Oncology AwardK12CA088084 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI David S. Hong, Scott Kopetz · 2000 to 2026
$14.0M
NCI NIH HHS K12 CA088084NCI NIH HHS K12CA088084-14NCI NIH HHS L30 CA136381NCI NIH HHS L30 CA136381-02NCI NIH HHS P30 CA016672
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo investigate potential dose-response relationship between radiation-associated nausea and vomiting (RANV) reported during radiotherapy and candidate nausea/vomiting-associated regions of interest (CNV-ROIs) in head and neck (HNC) squamous cell carcinomas. METHODS AND MATERIAL: A total of 130 patients treated with IMRT with squamous cell carcinomas of head and neck were evaluated. For each patient, CNV-ROIs were segmented manually on planning CT images. Clinical on-treatment RANV data were reconstructed by a review of the records for all patients. Dosimetric data parameters were recorded from dose-volume histograms. Nausea and vomiting reports were concatenated as a single binary "Any N/V" variable, and as a "CTC-V2+" variable.

resultsThe mean dose to CNV-ROIs was higher for patients experiencing RANV events. For patients receiving IMRT alone, a dose-response effect was observed with varying degrees of magnitude, at a statistically significant level for the area postrema, brainstem, dorsal vagal complex, medulla oblongata, solitary nucleus, oropharyngeal mucosa and whole brain CNV-ROIs.

conclusionRANV is a common therapy-related morbidity facing patients receiving HNC radiotherapy, and, for those receiving radiotherapy-alone, is associated with modifiable dose to specific CNS structures.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overBrainCarcinoma, Squamous CellDose-Response Relationship, RadiationFemaleHead and Neck NeoplasmsHumansLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedNauseaOrgans at RiskProspective StudiesRadiotherapy, Intensity-ModulatedBrainstemDorsal vagal complexIntensity modulated radiotherapyNauseaOrgan-at-riskVomiting

Identifiers

PMID24746582
PMCPMC4063998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.